A (im)prescindibilidade do prejuízo efetivo ao erário para configuração de ato de improbidade administrativa por fraude ou dispensa indevida de licitação
This monography aims to analize, from the perspective of the current and majority understanding of the Superior Court of Justice, the consequences of the presumption of damage in actions of administrative improbity arising from fraud or improper dismissal of bidding. Therefore, we first study the co...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | bachelorThesis |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/51760 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | This monography aims to analize, from the perspective of the current and majority understanding of the Superior Court of Justice, the consequences of the presumption of damage in actions of administrative improbity arising from fraud or improper dismissal of bidding. Therefore, we first study the concept of damage and its peculiarities in civil liability, disentangling in it patrimonial and moral modalities, so that, once these concepts are established, it can enter the presumed damage institute. Next, an initial approach to the Administrative Improbity Law is made, entering the heart of the research, which are the acts of administrative misconduct, especially the one that causes damage to the treasury. Once this premise is established, the institute of fraud and undue waiver of bidding will be discussed, making an analogous interpretation with the Bidding and Administrative Contracts Law, in order to defend the argument of the need for effective damage to the treasury for your configuration. Finally, it examines the most relevant judgments of the Superior Court of Justice, in order to reach a conclusion about the legality or illegality of the presumed damage to the treasury in actions of administrative improbity for fraud or improper bidding. |
|---|