A condição LGBTQIA+ no ambiente laboral e a perspectiva de proteção no Internacional e Constitucional: entre a normatividade e a autopercepção do sujeito
The paper investigates the challenges of inserting LGBTQIA+ people into the labor market. It is known that a person's gender should not be labeled or classified, since it has already passed the phase of binary classification, currently there are several ways to express or guide a person's...
Na minha lista:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Outros Autores: | |
Formato: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | pt_BR |
Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
Assuntos: | |
Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/46856 |
Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
Resumo: | The paper investigates the challenges of inserting LGBTQIA+ people into the labor
market. It is known that a person's gender should not be labeled or classified, since it has already
passed the phase of binary classification, currently there are several ways to express or guide a
person's sexuality, all of which must be respected, and they cannot be respected being the target
of discrimination, isolated sexuality, absent from other behaviors, is not capable of incapable
of any discriminatory conduct. Every person regardless of their sexual orientation or gender
identity is subject to the law, and as such must have protected their rights to life, freedom,
privacy beyond the right to equality and non-discrimination. For this desiderate, one should pay
to the Principle of the Dignity of the Human Person as structuring a Constitution of a
Democratic State. There was also an analysis of the protection of non-discrimination at national
and international level, through the study of cases and decisions on the theme of equality and
non-discrimination. It addresses the omission and legislative ineffectiveness given the absence
of laws dealing with the subject. Through a feta survey through a questionnaire directed to
people in the LGBTQIA+ group, respondents answered questions about their self-perception as
a subject of LGBTQIA+ law and whether their rights to privacy, freedom and non-
discrimination were respected in their work or social environment. |
---|