Autoria, singularidade e responsabilização na escrita de dissertações do âmbito dos estudos do discurso
Our studies on the production of dissertations have led us to the hypothesis that the works constructed in this institutionalized context are characterized by oscillation between authorial writing, in which there is a search for singularity, and writing that erases authorship. Although authorial and...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | doctoralThesis |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/58195 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | Our studies on the production of dissertations have led us to the hypothesis that the works constructed in this institutionalized context are characterized by oscillation between authorial writing, in which there is a search for singularity, and writing that erases authorship. Although authorial and singular constructions are not necessarily expected from this master's student, we observed that the indications offered by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and the studies by Lakatos and Marconi (1992) point to authorship. Thus, we propose to answer the question: how does the emerging researcher construct his/her authorship and manifest uniqueness in authoring the dissertation through the relationships between his/her own voice and the voices mobilized in his/her research? This research question is the basis of our general objective: to analyze how the researcher in training constructs his authorship and manifests uniqueness in his dissertation through the relationship between his own voice and the voices mobilized in the research. To fulfill the general objective, we have also established specific objectives: (1) verify how previous discussions permeates the writing of dissertations and whether/how the established relationships indicate deletions of singularity (2) investigate how researchers in training constitute themselves as authors of their texts and how they mark their uniqueness based on the evidence present in the writing of their works; (3) analyze how the theoretical-methodological relationships of the work contribute to the construction of authorship and achievements of singularity in the analytical chapters. Guided by these objectives, we analyzed six dissertations, three from academic master's degrees in Discourse Analysis (D1, D2 and D5) and three from the Professional Master's in Letters (PROFLETRAS) (D3, D4 and D6). We conducted these analyses based on interpretations of the of Discourse Analysis theories (Pêcheux, 2014a; 2014b; 1990a; 1990b), and drawing from the assumptions about authorship of Foucault (2009), Possenti (2002; 2013) and Maingueneau (2018) – with the triad person-writer-subscriber –; the perspective of singularity by Riolfi (2011), which join with the aspect of accountability based on Jonas (2006), Bakhtin (1993), Lacan (1998; 2007) and Forbes (2012), in addition to the concept of erasure of authorship, through Pêcheux (2014a), Schneider (1990), among others. Through these theoretical lenses, we developed qualitative research, with an interpretive bias (Silva; Araújo, 2017), using Ginzburg's evidentiary paradigm (1989). The analyzes indicate that the construction of the dissertations points to an oscillation between the need to belong to the academy, through the reproduction of its models and authors usually cited, and the need to differentiate itself in the midst of academic productions with authorial writing, which brings solutions unique to research problems. |
|---|