Diário de bordo: diálogos sobre turismo, áreas naturais protegidas e povos originários a partir da vivência no território indígena Eleotérios do Catu/RN
Understand tourism as dynamic and complex leads to assuming interdisciplinarity as a path to expanded inferences about this as a social phenomenon. Assuming these questions means reflecting on an epistemology of tourism that is made cross-border sliding their understanding from the contingencies...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | doctoralThesis |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/57410 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | Understand tourism as dynamic and complex leads to assuming interdisciplinarity as a path to expanded
inferences about this as a social phenomenon. Assuming these questions means reflecting on an
epistemology of tourism that is made cross-border sliding their understanding from the contingencies
that form the discourses from the position of the subjects. To analyse the discursive social practice
present at the intersection tourism, protected natural areas and native peoples from the understanding
of elements arising from the emergence of the processes of resistance and ethnogenesis in the
indigenous territory Eleotérios do Catu/ RN/ Brazil is the objective of this work. Foucault’s inspiration is
presented as a lens to observe this reality taking as a motto for a procedural analytical approach located
in critical studies in tourism. The investigative paths taken are based on a methodological path that was
not stopped throughout the process. This incorporates documentary analysis from primary and
secondary sources. The former are tied to institutional information linked to the themes analysed. On
Mondays, from the Narrative Literature Review (RNL) and the Systematic Literature Review (RSL).
Considering the empirical field of observation, the strategies assumed were participant observation,
semi-structured interviews with residents and through a focus group with visitors. These steps used
filmic ethnography as a mechanism of understanding, as well as remote platforms of social interaction.
In addition, it was also possible to register informal dialogues with state representatives both through
messaging applications and from visits to agencies, along with institutional requests via offices issued
by the Post-State Program Degree in Tourism from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte
(PPGTUR/UFRN). The results show that understanding the discursive social practice in the Territory
Eleóterios do Catu leads to realize the process of resumption and ethnogenesis present in that space
situating the discourses in the political perspective of resistance of native peoples. This makes the
characteristics of the reception of visitors held there configure as another strategy of self-affirmation and
self-recognition of the people who inhabit the territory. Thus, articulating the knowledge/do of tourist and
recreational practices among the Potiguaras do Katu refers to the understanding of the European
colonization process and the invisibilities resulting from it. This needs to dialogue with another reality
involved in the discursive practice of the territory, the fact that it is inserted in the National System of
Conservation Units (SNUC) as part of the Piquiri-Una Environmental Protection Area (APAPU) which
demands compliance with the normative devices located there. These can often still bring elements of
the hegemonic discourse of nature conservation of the twentieth century that disregards the voice of
resident populations, so that incorporating the voice of native peoples in the decision-making process
of managing such spaces is what is expected of man-nature relations in the 21st century. This is what
lies in the logbook presented here, a discussion that reflects on the need for dialogue between protected
natural areas and native peoples to better think/make the planning and management of tourism, whose
presentation will be in multi-paper format, through four chapters that dialogue with each other. |
|---|