O desenvolvimento do poder de ser afetado: sujeito e liberdade a partir do trabalho no Consultório na rua - uma mirada vigotskiana
This thesis investigated the development of the power-power to be affected (DPSA) from the work activity at the Consultório na Rua (CnaR). We consider DPSA as affective and psychological development and analyze DPSA in CnaR. CnaR is a SUS service that deals with the health needs of the homeless p...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | doctoralThesis |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/57343 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | This thesis investigated the development of the power-power to be affected (DPSA) from the
work activity at the Consultório na Rua (CnaR). We consider DPSA as affective and
psychological development and analyze DPSA in CnaR. CnaR is a SUS service that deals
with the health needs of the homeless population (PSR), that is, people who radically express
the capital-work contradiction. We work on affectivity in the activity of these professionals as
a privileged perspective to research technical-operative and ethical-political aspects. This is
exploratory research in work psychology based on Vygotskian principles. With this
perspective, through a nationwide questionnaire and two virtual workshops, we contacted the
research participants: professionals and former CnaR professionals. We demonstrate
DPSA-CnaR interrelations, addressing different aspects that characterize such work
situations. With what was produced, we consider that these professionals are experiencing a
dramatic dispute between models of care, the most committed end up, as they themselves
said, “gagged” and “sick”. In this sense, we perceive the neoliberal emptying of expanded
clinical practices and professional collectives that strive to recognize PSR in its entirety,
respecting and learning from the differences and singularities that constitute such people. In
such a situation, liberating care practices are suffocated by reifying and fragmented practices,
marked by an outpatient and dualistic clinic that have gradually undone the social heritage
built by the CnaR in these cities. At the same time, the professionals most involved and
consistent with defending the dignity of PSR become ill and the people served by the CnaR
are less considered singularly and affectively. Finally, it is worth saying that the meetings and
exchanges of experiences between professionals during the workshops proved to be important therapeutic and political resources for confronting the neoliberal culture of servitude and the
dismantling of the public things we live in. |
|---|