O imposto sobre grandes fortunas: sua aplicação internacional e possíveis consequências para o Brasil
This article seeks to investigate and discuss the consequences of the Wealth Tax in European countries, in order to try to establish possible paths to be followed for the institution and regulation of the Wealth Tax (IGF) in Brazil. To this end, a bibliographical review and comparative study were...
Na minha lista:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Outros Autores: | |
Formato: | bachelorThesis |
Idioma: | pt_BR |
Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
Assuntos: | |
Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/55299 |
Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
Resumo: | This article seeks to investigate and discuss the consequences of the Wealth Tax in European countries,
in order to try to establish possible paths to be followed for the institution and regulation of the Wealth
Tax (IGF) in Brazil. To this end, a bibliographical review and comparative study were used. The IGF has
the potential to increase the collection of public revenue derived in the tax category and reduce
economic inequality, acting as a full enshrinement of the principle of contributory capacity in the tax
sphere. However, tax avoidance and evasion have presented themselves as obstacles to the
effectiveness of the tax. Tax avoidance strategies,such as transferring assets to lower tax jurisdictions,
and tax evasion, through the omission or understatement of financial information, may compromise
the IGF's ability to meet its objectives. European countries have adopted measures to combat tax
evasion, such as improving supervision, strengthening international cooperation and implementing
stricter regulations. However, evasion continues to be a significant challenge, requiring constant
updating of policies and control mechanisms. The success of the IGF depends on effectively facing these
challenges, ensuring fiscal justice and compliance with tax obligations. Brazil, since the Federal
Constitution of 1988, could have regulated the IGF. It didn’t. Will it? |
---|