Evidences and gaps in scientific production on SUS managers: scoping review
Introduction: We hypothesized that there are gaps in knowledge about the managers of the Unified Health System (SUS) and that the term manager is used to designate different actors. Objective: To map the scientific production and synthesize the evidence on SUS managers from a scoping review. Meth...
Na minha lista:
| Principais autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | article |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
New Trends in Qualitative Research
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/55179 http://dx.doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.13.2022.e699 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| id |
ri-123456789-55179 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| institution |
Repositório Institucional |
| collection |
RI - UFRN |
| language |
pt_BR |
| topic |
revisão sistemática revisão de escopo métodos gestor de saúde |
| spellingShingle |
revisão sistemática revisão de escopo métodos gestor de saúde Castro, Janete Lima de Magnago, Carinne Ribeiro, Samara da Silva França, Tania Pinto, Isabela Cardoso M. Evidences and gaps in scientific production on SUS managers: scoping review |
| description |
Introduction: We hypothesized that there are gaps in knowledge about the
managers of the Unified Health System (SUS) and that the term manager is used to
designate different actors. Objective: To map the scientific production and synthesize the
evidence on SUS managers from a scoping review. Method: Scoping review guided by
PRISMA-ScR. The 'population, concept, context' approach was followed to formulate the
research question: What are the characteristics of publications and the main scientific
evidence on SUS managers? Studies were searched in scientific literature bases from the
combination of 53 terms. Selection was performed by reading titles, abstracts, and
methods, followed by full analytical reading. The data were submitted to the usual
techniques of descriptive statistical analysis and content analysis. Results: 51
publications were analyzed. There was a predominance of qualitative studies carried out
with municipal managers in the South and Southeast regions. Evidence was found on the
profile, attributions, and attributes of the manager and, to a lesser extent, on the
perceptions of managers about their role. Conclusions: There were different uses of the
term manager, a reduced number of studies that take SUS managers as the focus of
analysis, and scarcity of evidence on state and federal managers. The scoping review
proved to be a useful and rigorous method for mapping evidence and identifying gaps in
knowledge. |
| author2 |
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1823-9012 |
| author_facet |
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1823-9012 Castro, Janete Lima de Magnago, Carinne Ribeiro, Samara da Silva França, Tania Pinto, Isabela Cardoso M. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Castro, Janete Lima de Magnago, Carinne Ribeiro, Samara da Silva França, Tania Pinto, Isabela Cardoso M. |
| author_sort |
Castro, Janete Lima de |
| title |
Evidences and gaps in scientific production on SUS managers: scoping review |
| title_short |
Evidences and gaps in scientific production on SUS managers: scoping review |
| title_full |
Evidences and gaps in scientific production on SUS managers: scoping review |
| title_fullStr |
Evidences and gaps in scientific production on SUS managers: scoping review |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Evidences and gaps in scientific production on SUS managers: scoping review |
| title_sort |
evidences and gaps in scientific production on sus managers: scoping review |
| publisher |
New Trends in Qualitative Research |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| url |
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/55179 http://dx.doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.13.2022.e699 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT castrojanetelimade evidencesandgapsinscientificproductiononsusmanagersscopingreview AT magnagocarinne evidencesandgapsinscientificproductiononsusmanagersscopingreview AT ribeirosamaradasilva evidencesandgapsinscientificproductiononsusmanagersscopingreview AT francatania evidencesandgapsinscientificproductiononsusmanagersscopingreview AT pintoisabelacardosom evidencesandgapsinscientificproductiononsusmanagersscopingreview AT castrojanetelimade evidenciaselacunasnaproducaocientificasobreosgestoresdosusscopingreview AT magnagocarinne evidenciaselacunasnaproducaocientificasobreosgestoresdosusscopingreview AT ribeirosamaradasilva evidenciaselacunasnaproducaocientificasobreosgestoresdosusscopingreview AT francatania evidenciaselacunasnaproducaocientificasobreosgestoresdosusscopingreview AT pintoisabelacardosom evidenciaselacunasnaproducaocientificasobreosgestoresdosusscopingreview |
| _version_ |
1781991879758315520 |
| spelling |
ri-123456789-551792023-11-07T16:53:00Z Evidences and gaps in scientific production on SUS managers: scoping review Evidências e lacunas na produção científica sobre os gestores do SUS: scoping review Castro, Janete Lima de Magnago, Carinne Ribeiro, Samara da Silva França, Tania Pinto, Isabela Cardoso M. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1823-9012 revisão sistemática revisão de escopo métodos gestor de saúde Introduction: We hypothesized that there are gaps in knowledge about the managers of the Unified Health System (SUS) and that the term manager is used to designate different actors. Objective: To map the scientific production and synthesize the evidence on SUS managers from a scoping review. Method: Scoping review guided by PRISMA-ScR. The 'population, concept, context' approach was followed to formulate the research question: What are the characteristics of publications and the main scientific evidence on SUS managers? Studies were searched in scientific literature bases from the combination of 53 terms. Selection was performed by reading titles, abstracts, and methods, followed by full analytical reading. The data were submitted to the usual techniques of descriptive statistical analysis and content analysis. Results: 51 publications were analyzed. There was a predominance of qualitative studies carried out with municipal managers in the South and Southeast regions. Evidence was found on the profile, attributions, and attributes of the manager and, to a lesser extent, on the perceptions of managers about their role. Conclusions: There were different uses of the term manager, a reduced number of studies that take SUS managers as the focus of analysis, and scarcity of evidence on state and federal managers. The scoping review proved to be a useful and rigorous method for mapping evidence and identifying gaps in knowledge. Hipotetizamos que há lacunas no conhecimento sobre os gestores do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) e que o termo gestor é utilizado para designar diferentes atores. Objetivo: Mapear a produção científica e sintetizar as evidências sobre os gestores do SUS a partir de uma scoping review. Método: Scoping review orientada pelo PRISMA-ScR. A abordagem 'população, conceito, contexto' foi seguida para a formulação da questão de pesquisa: Quais as características das publicações e as principais evidências científicas sobre os gestores do SUS? Estudos foram buscados em bases de literatura científicas a partir da combinação de 53 termos. A seleção foi realizada pela leitura de títulos, resumos e métodos, seguida pela leitura integral analítica. Os dados foram submetidos a técnicas usuais de análise estatística descritiva e de análise de conteúdo. Resultados: 51 publicações foram analisadas. Observou-se predominância de estudos qualitativos realizados com gestores municipais das regiões Sul e Sudeste. Foram descobertas evidências sobre o perfil, atribuições e atributos do gestor e, em menor proporção, sobre as percepções dos gestores sobre a sua função. Conclusões: Verificou-se usos diferenciados do termo gestor, número reduzido de estudos que tomam os gestores do SUS como foco de análise, e escassez de evidências sobre gestores estaduais e federais. A scoping review mostrou-se método útil e rigoroso para o mapeamento de evidências e a identificação de lacunas no conhecimento 2023-11-07T16:53:00Z 2023-11-07T16:53:00Z 2022 article CASTRO, Janete Lima de; MAGNAGO, Carinne; RIBEIRO, Samara da Silva; FRANÇA, Tania; PINTO, Isabela Cardoso M.. Evidences and gaps in scientific production on SUS managers: scoping review. Associated Factors And More Frequent Sleep Disorders In University Students: Integrative review, [S.l.], p. 1-9, 8 jul. 2022. Ludomedia. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.13.2022.e699. Disponível em: https://publi.ludomedia.org/index.php/ntqr/article/view/699. Acesso em: 16 out. 2023. 2184-7770 https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/55179 http://dx.doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.13.2022.e699 pt_BR Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ application/pdf New Trends in Qualitative Research |