A cor da agroecologia: intersecções entre raça e gênero na construção do conhecimento agroecológico
This research aims to analyze how black women participate in Agroecology, in the context of the Women's Working Groups of the Brazilian Association of Agroecology (ABA) and the National Articulation of Agroecology (ANA), based on a decolonial approach and in dialogue with intersectional femi...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | doctoralThesis |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/54551 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | This research aims to analyze how black women participate in Agroecology, in the context of
the Women's Working Groups of the Brazilian Association of Agroecology (ABA) and the
National Articulation of Agroecology (ANA), based on a decolonial approach and in dialogue
with intersectional feminism. The specific objectives are: 1) To analyze how Agroecology
deals with the guidelines and contributions made by black women who are in the construction
of this field of knowledge, based on the Women's WG of ABA and ANA; 2) Understand how
the intersection, involving issues of race, gender, class and other markers, is treated in
Agroecology and; 3) Reflect on the impacts of coloniality on Agroecology. As
methodological strategies, a systematic literature review and a bibliographical review were
used, in addition to conducting 10 interviews with participants from the aforementioned GTs.
The research was based on the reflections of Angela Figueiredo (2020), Aníbal Quijano
(2005), Beatriz Nascimento (2021), Clóvis Moura (1983), Espinosa-Miñoso e Nadia Ziroldo
(2022), Grada Kilomba (2019), Jurema Werneck (2010), Liliam Schwarcz (1994), Ochy
Curiel (2019), Patricia Hill Collins (2020), Paula Balduíno de Melo (2010), Ramón
Grosfoguel (2019), Sueli Carneiro (2003), Vivian Motta (2020), among other equally
important authors. Relying on this theoretical framework, we question how the idealization
and naturalization of the universal woman category contribute to the erasure and silencing of
black women in the construction of this area of knowledge and we observe how women who
suffer from racialization processes have mediated/claimed its place of enunciation in this
context. Considering that the women involved in the construction of Agroecological praxis
claim the visibility and appreciation of their participation and protagonism, the racial issue is
still silenced, motivated by a white narcissistic indignation, a category named by Cida Bento
(2002), with which we are associated. As a result, we noticed that, although agroecology
announces in its discourse the proposition of a project of social transformation with a view to
confronting and overcoming social, racial and gender inequalities, in search of well-being for
society as a whole, in In practice, however, gender assumed a central role in the narratives.
The struggle that has been waged by the feminist movement in Agroecology has advanced in
understanding the existence of a diversity of women: peasant, indigenous, asian, quilombola,
rural, among others, however, anti-racism still does not necessarily materialize as a practice
and remains marginal, from the analysis point of view. Even so, it was possible to verify in
the interviewees' statements the recognition of intersectionality as an important theoreticalreflexive instrument, but without exploring its political character, summing up to a rhetorical appeal. |
|---|