As representações textual-discursivas de José Dirceu e da Operação Lava Jato (re)construídas no acórdão de habeas corpus prolatado pelo TRF4
This thesis analysed the textual-discursive representations (TDR) of José Dirceu and of Operation Carwash in its (re)structured redaction in the court ruling elaborated by TRF4 (Fourth Region Federal Tribunal) that denied the habeas corpus requested by Dirceu’s defence. For that purpose, we based...
Shranjeno v:
Glavni avtor: | |
---|---|
Drugi avtorji: | |
Format: | doctoralThesis |
Jezik: | pt_BR |
Izdano: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
Teme: | |
Online dostop: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/54532 |
Oznake: |
Označite
Brez oznak, prvi označite!
|
Izvleček: | This thesis analysed the textual-discursive representations (TDR) of José Dirceu and of
Operation Carwash in its (re)structured redaction in the court ruling elaborated by TRF4
(Fourth Region Federal Tribunal) that denied the habeas corpus requested by Dirceu’s
defence. For that purpose, we based the study on Grize’s theoretical scheme and
argumentative omnipresence and on Textual-Discursive Analysis (TDA), electing a
methodological approach according to Adam (2011, 2017, 2019). The research focused on the
semantic and the argumentative aspects of the court ruling, highlighting schematization,
TDRs and argumentative orientation. To explore the juridic discourse, this work considered
researches such as the ones developed by Lourenço (2015), Nucci (2019), Rodrigues (2016),
amongst others. Methodologically, we adopted the mixed method (deductive and inductive).
Based on the sources used, the research is classified as bibliographical and documental and,
according to its goals, is an investigation of descriptive and explanatory traits, with a
qualitative outlook of the studied material. The research’s corpus is the ruling that resulted
from José Dirceu’s habeas corpus judgement (503454282.2015.4.04.0000/PR), after his
preventive incarceration, decreed by the 13th Federal Court of the Judiciary Subsection in
Curitiba/PR in 3 August of 2015 in the context of the 17th phase of Operation Carwash. Under
the argument of a lacking array of fundaments in the arrestment order, the defence formalized
the habeas corpus to TRF4, occasion in which it was denied. For the analysis of the TDRs,
this study uses specific textualizing operations: referencing, modification of referencing,
predication and modification of predication. The results evidence different RTDs for José
Dirceu that include the juridic sphere (patient, investigated subject, jurisprudential), the
political universe (former Chief of Staff Minister, high ranking politician), the professional
ambit (partner to his brother, consultant to company JD Assessoria e Consultoria LTDA) and
the Operation Carwash investigation (operation of extraordinary dimension, biggest operation,
operation of one of the most promiscuous relations between public and private interests,
biggest corruption case investigated). As a result, it was noted that the lexical selection and
the recategorization (re)construct Dirceu and Operation Carwash’s RTDs. Both linguistic
operations are found discursively in the text, in an individualized manner, and also
collectively in social spheres. The categories investigated can be considered, enunciatively, as
the effects of the argumentative strategies used by the chief judges to orientate
argumentatively that, as José Dirceu was the mentor of a criminal organization, the habeas
corpus requested had to be denied considering the necessity or guaranteeing the public order.
The processes of (re)construction of the RTDs are created within the text’s continuity and
speak of the construction of meanings in the text that derivate from schematization and
omnipresence of argumentation. Furthermore, the linguistic strategies of introduction and of
resuming the referent characterize/qualify the object of speech peculiarly in a process of
anaphoric referencing. In view of the social importance of the forensic text and, especially, of
the impact of the court ruling in the lives of the Brazilian citizens and in academic studies, it
was possible to perceive the relevance of researches that analyse the texts semantically,
focusing the construction of the object of speech’s representations considering the
argumentative orientation. |
---|