Uso de drone em estudos de drenagem urbana: comparativo da aplicação no diagnóstico para o plano de saneamento básico de São Fernando - RN com o plano de saneamento básico de Serra Caiada - RN.
The theme of Basic Sanitation is currently a problem discussed around the world, including one of the concerns of the UN 2030 agenda. Within the basic sanitation, in Brazil, is included the aspect of the drainage system and management of rainwater, a strand analyzed in this research. And just as the...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | bachelorThesis |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/53732 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | The theme of Basic Sanitation is currently a problem discussed around the world, including one of the concerns of the UN 2030 agenda. Within the basic sanitation, in Brazil, is included the aspect of the drainage system and management of rainwater, a strand analyzed in this research. And just as the concern with sanitation as a whole the lack of data and quality is also a complaint of the UN, in this perspective this work had as main objective to make a comparative synthesis analysis of the results from a diagnosis made based on drone images in the drainage system and management of urban rainwater of the municipality of São Fernando - RN with the results obtained without drone image in the diagnosis of the municipality of Serra Caiada-RN. With this it was possible to notice that as the use of drone obtained a base of studies and analyses with spatial resolution of 18cm while in the study without the use of drone was used a base of 30m of spatial resolution, thus it is concluded that when it
comes to data quality for studies of urban drainage and mapping of risks to floods the results of the diagnosis made from the drone images were superior, and, with regard to the quality of the data and in relation to costs, it is cheaper and more productive if compared with conventional topographic surveys, however more expensive if compared to the survey done in Serra Caiada which used free images of government bases. |
|---|