Sentença trabalhista de dano moral: análise do plano de texto, do ponto de vista e da responsabilidade enunciativa
Analyzing the discursive genre labor sentence of moral damage, circumscribed to the legal domain, regarding the phenomena of text plan, point of view and enunciative responsibility is our purpose in this work. Therefore, we aim to identify, describe, analyze and interpret a) how the text plan of...
Na minha lista:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Outros Autores: | |
Formato: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | pt_BR |
Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
Assuntos: | |
Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/52595 |
Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
Resumo: | Analyzing the discursive genre labor sentence of moral damage, circumscribed to the legal
domain, regarding the phenomena of text plan, point of view and enunciative responsibility is
our purpose in this work. Therefore, we aim to identify, describe, analyze and interpret a) how
the text plan of the analyzed sentences is constituted; b) the points of view articulated in the
decision; and c) the linguistic markers related to the enunciative responsibility of the first
speaker/enunciator (S1/E1). In this way, we executed a research with a qualitative approach,
fundamentally interpretative, and with documentary analysis through the inductive method.
The corpus consists of thirteen labor sentences, one from each Labor Court of Natal, RN
(Brazil), linked to the Tribunal Regional do Trabalho/Regional Labor Court of the 21st
Region (TRT21), responsible for promoting justice in labor relations in the state of Rio
Grande do Norte (RN). We selected the sentences considering the following criteria: 1) that
the sentence is a definitive one; 2) that it follows the common procedural rite; 3) that it
addresses a claim for moral damages; and 4) that it has been judged between 2018 and 2020,
considering that the last Labor Court of Natal, was created in September 2017. From this last
Court, we have sentences with the established criteria as of 2018. The delimitation of the final
period is the year immediately prior to our entry into the master's program. For data
collection, we resorted to the website www.trt21.jus.br, which is publicly accessible. The
research is based on the theoretical postulates of Textual Analysis of Discourses, Theory of
Enunciation and Discourse Analysis. In this direction, we follow authors who work with
Enunciative Responsibility, among them, Adam (2011), Rabatel (2017), Rodrigues (2016,
2017) and Passeggi et al. (2010), in dialogue with linguistic approaches related to the Point of
View, from the perspective of Rabatel (2013, 2016), and to the Text Plan, with Adam (2011,
2021, 2022), Rodrigues and Marquesi (2021), Marquesi (2016 ), Cabral (2013), Marquesi,
Cabral and Rodrigues (2020) among others. Data analysis points to the following results: we
found that the text plan of the analyzed sentences is presented as fixed or conventional, but
with variations resulting from the organization of each magistrate. We observed the
predominance of non-assumption of enunciative responsibility in the report section, which
was evident by the use of impersonality markers and indirect speech by the S1/E1. We also
identified that, although there is no assumption of enunciative responsibility in the reasoning
of the sentences, which is evident by the use of indirect and direct speeches by the judge, it is
predominant, in this textual zone, the assumption of enunciative responsibility by the magistrate, as a S1/E1, what was possible to verify, mainly, by spatial deictic markers,
modalities and verbs in the first person singular. In the device section, we found that the
assumption of enunciative responsibility predominates, even though the judge is implicitly
engaged with the propositional content conveyed. As for the point of view, we found that the
linguistic markers point to the argumentative orientation of the judge, sometimes in the sense
of condemning the defendant to pay compensation for moral damages and sometimes in the
sense of rejecting the claim of the plaintiff, predominating in the sentence the point of view
narrated and represented in the report and asserted in the reasoning and device sections. |
---|