Um lugar de produção e a produção de um lugar: a construção da centralidade do eixo Rio-São Paulo na historiografia Acadêmica Brasileira (1990-2021)
The main objective of this work is to produce a study about the spatial hierarchization of historical knowledge in Brazil through production places and historiographic narratives in which the Rio-São Paulo axis emerges as widespread and diffuse spatiality in the national territory. This event occ...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Dissertação |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/52084 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | The main objective of this work is to produce a study about the spatial hierarchization
of historical knowledge in Brazil through production places and historiographic
narratives in which the Rio-São Paulo axis emerges as widespread and diffuse spatiality
in the national territory. This event occurred in parallel with the design of a professional
and academic Brazilian Historiography, as well as in an environment – from the 1980s
and 1990s – in which there was an emergency in academic journals and in the
specialized literature of historiographical reflections as a wholesome. This was largely
due to the discussion around historiographic renewals, the emergence of new graduate
programs in the different regions of the country and the production of a
historiographical memory of the institutions. Thus, this research venture is situated
between the history of historiography and a cultural history of spaces. This means
emphasizing spatial construction as an aspect resulting from discursive operations that
attribute meaning to the national space through historiographical images and
representations, as well as through places of production and enunciation of historical
knowledge in constant litigation in the narrative of historians. These layers of tensions
are expressed between narratives, problems seen as methodological fallibility in the
treatment with documentation, errors in the spatial clipping of research, institutional
disputes and/or between groups of historians and through a national paradigm. In these
disputes, historical discourse is shown as a relevant aspect, because it is through it and
that borders are raised and territories materialize, as well as identities and social and
subject places. The sources mobilized were the writings of historians and the writings
on and around institutional disputes within the scope of history in the sense of a venture
whose own object is the mapping of existing spatial tensions. Cartography is the
methodology designed to suggest the coexistence of different paths, paths and historical
trajectories that ended up circumscribing spatial regimes in the writing of historians
who work in the national territory. Thus, we will problematize the historical
construction of spatial clipping data in the narrative of historians, providing progress in
research on spatial hierarchies in Brazilian historiography. |
|---|