Reconstituindo o desenho do habitat de reforma agrária: legados e possibilidades para o Estado
What is the legacy of the National Institute of Colonization and Land Reform (INCRA) regarding the design production of the land reform habitat? This thesis derives from the search to answer this question. Its objective consists in analyze the production process of the habitat design of the land...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | doctoralThesis |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/51933 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | What is the legacy of the National Institute of Colonization and Land
Reform (INCRA) regarding the design production of the land reform
habitat? This thesis derives from the search to answer this question.
Its objective consists in analyze the production process of the habitat
design of the land reform settlements executed by the State in order
to contribute to its actions in the country. Assuming, as a starting
point, the hypothesis that "the INCRA’s exclusive production in
relation to the design of land reform habitats in Brazil had a more
quantitative approach than a qualitative one, knowing the
implemented habitats do not satisfy the needs and expectations of
the settlers". Therefore, in the context of the transformations that
modified the habitat and inhabits manners of society, mainly in the
countryside - known not as a space opposed to the city, but
complementary to it - the land reform habitats are: the place where
the individual inhabits and develops its everyday life (BORGES,
2002). In addition to the design, regarding the responsibilities for
planning actions, conception and demarcation in the physical place;
and basic infrastructure implementation, the State acts through
INCRA. Created in 1970, since then INCRA has been contributing
to the design of our territory. From 1970 to 1985 through the
colonization policy, INCRA implemented the colonization integrated
projects (PIC), using the Rural Planning to design the habitats. The
delimitation of the habitat design of the land reform already occurs
in the last 30 years. This policy, however, was not made a priority to
many governments post-Constitution of 1988, besides the struggle of
the social movements for its realization. Along with the most diverse
inherent limitations to habitat questions - regulatory; financial and
human resources; among others - INCRA still designing, occupying
and transforming the Brazilian territory. Nevertheless, this thesis
constitutes the relation between the habitats design of land reform and the State actuation. In order to achieve the proposed objectives, it was
used as theoretical background the dialectical method regressiveprogressive created by Marx and developed by Lefebvre and others
postulates by him and the ones by Borges (2002). The empirical field
corresponds to 286 rural settlements created by the national policy of land
reform situated in the state of Rio Grande do Norte, RN, in the studied
timeline: from 1985 to 2013. In this time period the following governments
occurred: Sarney (1985-1989); Collor (1990-1992); Itamar (1992-1995);
Fernando H. Cardoso (FHC) (1995-2002); Lula (2003-2010); Dilma
(2011-2013). The materiality of the empirical field is limited to the 1
settlement habitats of one of each 6 periods. Thus, starting from the current
situation of habitating the rural territory of Brazil, it is possible to ponder
about the present and past in the production of habitat: habitating and
habitat in land reform and habitat design of land reform. Subsequently, the
practice of the State and the habitat design in land reform was approached,
afterwards, was performed a study of its production in RN. Observing that
the differences between the biggest and smallest quantitative created -
during FHC’s government were created 202 settlements, while during
Itamar were only 2 - INCRA/RN legacy is composed by a pattern of
habitat design of land reform. In the Settlement Scale exist 1 concentrated
habitat located in the settlement’s edge accessed through neighboring road.
Whereas in the Habitat Scale prevails the orthogonal typology for physical
configuration. Regarding the realization process, it results from the
correlation of forces among acting agents: INCRA’s technicians; settled
and social movements (unionized or not). Absences are also identified. In
conclusion, possibilities are pointed in order to optimize policies and
management of the State to design the habitat of land reform. |
|---|