O instituto da colaboração premiada no Tribunal do Júri
The following paper has the main goal to evaluate if it is possible to apply the plea bargain in the jury court, and if it is possible, how this would work. It also intends to study the two institutes with practical goals and use the plea bargain with the a utilitarian perspective of reinforcement t...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | bachelorThesis |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/51500 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| id |
ri-123456789-51500 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| institution |
Repositório Institucional |
| collection |
RI - UFRN |
| language |
pt_BR |
| topic |
Direito Penal Direito Processual Penal Colaboração premiada Tribunal do Júri Crimes dolosos contra a vida Criminal Law Criminal Procedural Law Award-winning collaboration Jury court Willful crimes against life Ciências Sociais Aplicadas - Direito - Direito Público (Direito Penal e Direito Processual Penal). |
| spellingShingle |
Direito Penal Direito Processual Penal Colaboração premiada Tribunal do Júri Crimes dolosos contra a vida Criminal Law Criminal Procedural Law Award-winning collaboration Jury court Willful crimes against life Ciências Sociais Aplicadas - Direito - Direito Público (Direito Penal e Direito Processual Penal). Farias, Karielson Fernandes de O instituto da colaboração premiada no Tribunal do Júri |
| description |
The following paper has the main goal to evaluate if it is possible to apply the plea bargain in the jury court, and if it is possible, how this would work. It also intends to study the two institutes with practical goals and use the plea bargain with the a utilitarian perspective of reinforcement to the criminal prosecution of intention crimes against life, especially homicide. It is used the bibliographic methodological procedure, and the research exploratory, basic and qualitative. For so, this paper studies the plea bargain in its theoretical basis, highlighting its conceptualization, nomenclature and juridical nature through various angles. It aims to describe a historical report about the paper goal, defining its origins and legislative evolution until the edition of the law nº 12.850/13. It still analyzes the legal regulation of the institute in the Law mentioned before and its most important questions to the subject under discussion. On the other side, it verifies the constitutional bases of the jury, based on the integrality of defense, secrecy of voting, sovereignty of verdicts and competence to the trial of the intention crimes against life, for then punctuate the details of the biphasic procedure described in the code of criminal procedure. Moreover, it highlights that the crimes of the Jury can be committed in context of organizational base, mainly the murder, given as example many kinds of organized groups to the crime execution. Comparing the highlighted points, it shows that the plea bargain is useful to the jury court, serving as a mechanism of protection of the fundamental rights. It proves that it is more correct to the compatibilization to use the Law nº 12.850/13, for being about the normative ethics. It ensures that there is no conflict between the collaboration agreement as described in the Law nº 12.850/13 and the federal constitution. Therefore, being convinced of using the plea bargain in the jury court, as long as some precautions are taken, due specific suggestions for legislative changes are made for the improvement of this debated topic. |
| author2 |
Silva Júnior, Walter Nunes da |
| author_facet |
Silva Júnior, Walter Nunes da Farias, Karielson Fernandes de |
| format |
bachelorThesis |
| author |
Farias, Karielson Fernandes de |
| author_sort |
Farias, Karielson Fernandes de |
| title |
O instituto da colaboração premiada no Tribunal do Júri |
| title_short |
O instituto da colaboração premiada no Tribunal do Júri |
| title_full |
O instituto da colaboração premiada no Tribunal do Júri |
| title_fullStr |
O instituto da colaboração premiada no Tribunal do Júri |
| title_full_unstemmed |
O instituto da colaboração premiada no Tribunal do Júri |
| title_sort |
o instituto da colaboração premiada no tribunal do júri |
| publisher |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| url |
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/51500 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT fariaskarielsonfernandesde oinstitutodacolaboracaopremiadanotribunaldojuri |
| _version_ |
1773957865802825728 |
| spelling |
ri-123456789-515002023-03-07T15:35:26Z O instituto da colaboração premiada no Tribunal do Júri Farias, Karielson Fernandes de Silva Júnior, Walter Nunes da Silva Júnior, Walter Nunes da Carvalho, Ivan Lira de Coêlho, Ana Carolina Guilherme Direito Penal Direito Processual Penal Colaboração premiada Tribunal do Júri Crimes dolosos contra a vida Criminal Law Criminal Procedural Law Award-winning collaboration Jury court Willful crimes against life Ciências Sociais Aplicadas - Direito - Direito Público (Direito Penal e Direito Processual Penal). The following paper has the main goal to evaluate if it is possible to apply the plea bargain in the jury court, and if it is possible, how this would work. It also intends to study the two institutes with practical goals and use the plea bargain with the a utilitarian perspective of reinforcement to the criminal prosecution of intention crimes against life, especially homicide. It is used the bibliographic methodological procedure, and the research exploratory, basic and qualitative. For so, this paper studies the plea bargain in its theoretical basis, highlighting its conceptualization, nomenclature and juridical nature through various angles. It aims to describe a historical report about the paper goal, defining its origins and legislative evolution until the edition of the law nº 12.850/13. It still analyzes the legal regulation of the institute in the Law mentioned before and its most important questions to the subject under discussion. On the other side, it verifies the constitutional bases of the jury, based on the integrality of defense, secrecy of voting, sovereignty of verdicts and competence to the trial of the intention crimes against life, for then punctuate the details of the biphasic procedure described in the code of criminal procedure. Moreover, it highlights that the crimes of the Jury can be committed in context of organizational base, mainly the murder, given as example many kinds of organized groups to the crime execution. Comparing the highlighted points, it shows that the plea bargain is useful to the jury court, serving as a mechanism of protection of the fundamental rights. It proves that it is more correct to the compatibilization to use the Law nº 12.850/13, for being about the normative ethics. It ensures that there is no conflict between the collaboration agreement as described in the Law nº 12.850/13 and the federal constitution. Therefore, being convinced of using the plea bargain in the jury court, as long as some precautions are taken, due specific suggestions for legislative changes are made for the improvement of this debated topic. O trabalho em questão tem o objetivo de avaliar a possibilidade de aplicação da colaboração premiada no Tribunal do Júri e, caso seja, como seria. Intenta estudar os dois institutos com objetivos práticos, utilizar a colaboração premiada com o viés utilitarista de reforço para persecução penal de crimes dolosos contra a vida, principalmente o homicídio. Utiliza o procedimento metodológico bibliográfico, sendo a pesquisa exploratória, básica e qualitativa. Para tanto, estuda a colaboração premiada em suas bases teóricas, ressaltando sua conceituação, nomenclatura e natureza jurídica sob os diversos ângulos. Empreende também rápido escorço histórico a seu respeito, definindo suas raízes e evolução legislativa até a edição da Lei nº 12.850, de 2013. Analisa ainda a disciplina legal do instituto na Lei nº 12.850, de 2013, e suas questões mais importantes para a temática proposta. Por outro lado, verifica as bases constitucionais do Júri, concretizadas na plenitude de defesa, no sigilo das votações, na soberania dos veredictos e na competência para o julgamento dos crimes dolosos contra a vida, para só então pontuar as nuances do procedimento bifásico disciplinado no Código de Processo Penal. Ademais, destaca que os crimes do Júri podem ser praticados em contexto de base organizativa, sobretudo o homicídio, exemplificando-se com diversos tipos de grupos organizados para o cometimento deste crime. Cotejando as questões delineadas, demonstra que a colaboração premiada é útil ao Tribunal do Júri, servindo de mecanismo de proteção de direitos fundamentais. Aduz que a disciplina legal a ser usada na compatibilização é a da Lei nº 12.850/13, por se tratar de normativa geral. Sustenta inexistir conflito entre o acordo de colaboração como inscrito na Lei nº 12.850, de 2013, e a Constituição Federal. Assim, conclui pugnando pela possibilidade de se utilizar a colaboração premiada no Júri, desde que feitas algumas ressalvas e tomados certos cuidados, pelo que se fazem sugestões pontuais de modificações legislativas para aprimoramento do que está posto. 2022-08-25T12:42:22Z 2023-03-07T15:35:26Z 2022-08-25T12:42:22Z 2023-03-07T15:35:26Z 2019-06-14 bachelorThesis 2014077816 FARIAS, Karielson Fernandes de. O instituto da colaboração premiada no Tribunal do Júri. 2019. 78f. Monografia (Graduação) - Curso de Direito, Centro de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2019. https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/51500 pt_BR Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ application/pdf Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Brasil UFRN Direito |