Liberdade segurança: argumentos políticos em tempos de coronavírus
As far as political philosophy is concerned, it is undoubted that the Modern State provoked an intense transformation in the way of being of societies. The contractualist foundational act conceived a model of society governed by norms with the purpose of the common good. It is in this perspective...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | doctoralThesis |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/51303 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | As far as political philosophy is concerned, it is undoubted that the Modern State
provoked an intense transformation in the way of being of societies. The contractualist
foundational act conceived a model of society governed by norms with the purpose of
the common good. It is in this perspective that our problem is inserted, about the
weighting of freedom in the face of security in a study applied to the context of the
coronavirus pandemic. Our question is: does freedom prevail over security in the
context of state norms that regulate the coronavirus (covid-19), such as classical
contractualism in any and all contexts of life in society? In this way, we aim as a
proposal to carry out a study of applied philosophy from the balance between Freedom
and Security considering the different dimensions of political life. As a parameter, we
used the normative instruments of the government of Rio Grande do Norte with regard
to the coronavirus. It is a reflection on this unique attribute of man, which encompasses
the set of must-be systems considering the prevalence of security in the face of
freedom. Our hypothesis is that from the intertwining between freedom and security
we can observe a process of exceptionality, based on the issue of public health arising
from covid-19. There is a prevalence of security over freedom, a “security state”, a
state in which for reasons of security – public health – any limits can be imposed on
individual freedoms; and, as a consequence of this hypothesis, whether this
exceptionality would not be a new way of doing politics, a “new normal” for the
performance of the State. Since our justification is clear and due to the theoretical and
social relevance and originality, the proposal resorts to bibliographic and documental
research with content analysis, following a methodological approach with the
administration of evidence, in view of its application in the sense of a systematization
of the reality. In summary, we reaffirm our understanding that the period of the Global
Pandemic, the actions of governments could have been aimed at inspiring, organizing
and financing a coordinated global response in collective terms, but unfortunately we
did not see anything hopeful. |
|---|