Doença ocupacional e COVID-19: uma análise à luz da ADI 6.380
The present work aims to make a brief study of the Institute of Labor Law called occupational disease, considering parallel institutes and relevant principles of Labor Law to the discussion so that, from there, an analysis of how the Brazilian government sought to preserve the health of companies an...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | bachelorThesis |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/51115 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | The present work aims to make a brief study of the Institute of Labor Law called occupational disease, considering parallel institutes and relevant principles of Labor Law to the discussion so that, from there, an analysis of how the Brazilian government sought to preserve the health of companies and maintain jobs simultaneously, in the midst of the health and economic crisis of COVID-19, with emphasis on Executive Order 927/2020. The understanding taken by the Federal Supreme Court was also analyzed during the judgment of Direct Unconstitutionality Action 6.380 and notably in the points where it questioned the constitutionality of the article 29 of the aforementioned Executive Order, which dealt with the possibility of framing COVID as an occupational disease. For this, literature review methods were used to study doctrinal concepts and historical constructions of Labor Law institutes; jurisprudence analysis, to seek the understanding that the Labor Courts have been applying in some relevant points; and critical analysis, so that a reflection on the application of the institute and how it should be properly applied can be initiated. At the end of this work, it was observed that the application of the law by the Federal Supreme Court in the judgment of the Executive Order in the Direct Unconstitutionality Action 6,380 of the Federal District was considered adequate. |
|---|