Cimentação adesiva de cerâmicas vítreas para CAD/CAM: efeito do tipo de sistema adesivo e do envelhecimento em longo prazo na resistência de união ao cimento resinoso

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the type of adhesive system and aging on the wettability and bond strength of glass ceramics to resin cement. Lithium silicate (SL - Celtra Duo, Dentsply Sirona), feldspathic (FD - Vita Mark II, VITA Zahnfabrik) and polymerinfiltrated ceramic (PI...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Silva, Nathalia Ramos da
Outros Autores: Souza, Rodrigo Othavio de Assunção e
Formato: doctoralThesis
Idioma:pt_BR
Publicado em: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Assuntos:
Endereço do item:https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/49940
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
Descrição
Resumo:The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the type of adhesive system and aging on the wettability and bond strength of glass ceramics to resin cement. Lithium silicate (SL - Celtra Duo, Dentsply Sirona), feldspathic (FD - Vita Mark II, VITA Zahnfabrik) and polymerinfiltrated ceramic (PIC - Vita Enamic, VITA Zahnfabrik) blocks were sectioned (N=96, 10 x 12 x 2 mm), included and randomly divided into 24 groups according to the factors: “Ceramics” (SL, FD and PIC), “Adhesive” (CONT–without adhesive; C2P–conventional 2-step adhesive; C3P–adhesive conventional 3-step; UNV–universal adhesive) and “Aging” (SE-non-aged; CEaged). After the conditioning of the ceramics (HF 5%), silanization and application of the adhesive system according to the experimental group, cylinders (n=15, Ø = 2 mm and height = 2 mm) of resin cement (RelyX Ultimate, 3M ESPE) were made (4 cylinders/block) and half of the samples were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24h (SE) and half were subjected to thermocycling 10,000 cycles and storage in water at 37°C for 18 months (EC). Then, the samples were submitted to the shear bond strength test (RUC - 100 KgF, 1 mm/min), failure analysis, contact angle measurement and interface analysis by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RUC (MPa) and contact angle data were analyzed by ANOVA 2-way and ANOVA 1-way, respectively, and Tukey (5%). Weibull analysis was performed for RUC. ANOVA 2-way revealed that the “Adhesive” factor was significant only for SL (p<0.0001) and FD (p=0.0079) ceramics. The Adhesive/Aging interaction (p=0.0015) and “Aging” (p=0.0008) were significant only for SL. For SL, after aging, the CE_UNV (22.18± 7.74CD) and CE_C2P (17.32± 5.86D) groups were lower than the control (30.30± 6.11A). Only the UNV group showed a significant decrease after aging. For FD, C2P had the lowest RUC in relation to the other groups. PIC showed similarity of RUC between all groups. The UNV contact angle presented the lowest value for SL (55.27°) and FD (51.34°). For PIC, C3P presented the highest angle (63.00°) and CONT the smallest (49.83°). Therefore, the application of an adhesive was not beneficial for the adhesion of the ceramic to the resin cement. Furthermore, the use of C2P and UNV after silanization of SL and C2P ceramics for FD should be evaluated with caution, as the bond strength was reduced compared to the control group after aging.