A população de rua em seus modos de vida, multiplicidades e singularidades no Cariri cearense
In this research, we seek to think about how a global phenomenon, the people living in the streets, is singularized in the region of Cariri, in the Brazilian state of Ceará. We had the general objetive of analyze the singularities and multiplicities concerning the lifestyle of the people living i...
Na minha lista:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Outros Autores: | |
Formato: | doctoralThesis |
Idioma: | pt_BR |
Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
Assuntos: | |
Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/49310 |
Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
Resumo: | In this research, we seek to think about how a global phenomenon, the people living in the
streets, is singularized in the region of Cariri, in the Brazilian state of Ceará. We had the general
objetive of analyze the singularities and multiplicities concerning the lifestyle of the people
living in the streets, in Cariri, Ceará, and, especifically, to describe the historical elements that
are present in the production of the people living in the streets, in this region and how they are
maintained in a history of the present; to comprehend the lifestyle of the people living in the
streets, of Cariri in the process of producing and being produced by the city; to identify the
impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the people living in the streets of Cariri. From the
methodological point of view, we carried out an ethnographic orientation work, from which we
made use of participant and itinerant observation, daily life conversations, and field diary
records, which resulted in the construction of two axes of analysis: what is common in the Cariri
people living in the streets and elsewhere, as workers, unemployed people, migrants, and drug
users; what is unique about this population, typical of the region, which are the figures of the
blessed, pilgrims, and remnants of the Casa de Santa Teresa Psychiatric Hospital. Still as a
methodological resource, in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, we carried out a research with
reports, in which we sought to outline the actions taken in relation to the people living in the
streets that exist through their relationship with the city, in a double movement of producing it
and being produced by it. As for the pandemic, we identified that many actions aimed at the
people living in the streets were carried out by civil society; not by public policies. The State
was negligent in its actions or in the way it performed them, but we had a solidarity network
that produced other ways of taking care of this population. |
---|