Tempo de confecção clínica e laboratorial de placas oclusais convencionais x fresadas em pacientes com bruxismo do sono: ensaio clínico
The aim of the study was to compare the clinical and laboratory preparation time and clinical adjustments for the installation of conventional thermopolymerizable resin splint (CS) and milled CAD/CAM (MS) occlusal splints in patients with sleep bruxism. For this purpose, a controlled and non-rand...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Dissertação |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/49302 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | The aim of the study was to compare the clinical and laboratory preparation time and
clinical adjustments for the installation of conventional thermopolymerizable resin splint
(CS) and milled CAD/CAM (MS) occlusal splints in patients with sleep bruxism. For
this purpose, a controlled and non-randomized clinical trial was carried out in which
patients diagnosed with probable sleep bruxism were included. CS (n = 24) and MS (n
= 24) were prepared and the clinical preparation time (CPT), laboratory preparation
time (LPT) and installation time (IT) were measured for each of the splints. The Mannwhitney test with a confidence level of 95% was used in the SPSS IBM Statistics
program to analyze whether there is a difference between the analyzed times and the
type splint performed. As a result, it was found that CS had higher total CPT (mean of
94,39 min) in relation to MS (17,85 min) (p0<001). However, the total LPT of the CS
was lower (164,80 min) than the MS (182,64min) (p=0.015). For the IT, it was found
that the MS had an average of 21,26 min, while the CS had 37,19min (p0<001). In
conclusion, within the limitations of the study, it was observed that the milled splint had
a shorter clinical time both in the manufacturing and installation stages. However, the
laboratory preparation time of the conventional splint was shorter. |
|---|