Formulação de estratégias na perspectiva do decisor: validação de escala de mensuração para o Setor Público
This research has the general objective of validating and adapting to the public sector an instrument to measure the formulation of strategy in organizations. This instrument was developed by Lucian, Barbosa, Sousa Filho, Pereira e Silva, in 2008, and is based on studies by De Wit and Meyer (2004...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Dissertação |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/47525 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | This research has the general objective of validating and adapting to the public sector an instrument
to measure the formulation of strategy in organizations. This instrument was developed by Lucian,
Barbosa, Sousa Filho, Pereira e Silva, in 2008, and is based on studies by De Wit and Meyer
(2004), who describe that strategy formulation is a three-dimensional construct, composed by
paradoxes that demand controversial choices from the decision maker. The dimensions and
paradoxes are: i) strategic thinking, composed of the paradox between logical versus creative
thinking; ii) strategy formation, made up of the paradox between deliberate versus emergent
formation; and iii) strategic change, constituted by the paradox between evolutionary versus
revolutionary change. The scale was applied online, through the Google Forms website, with 270
public servants who make up a collegiate at the Federal Institute of Rio Grande do Norte, called
Colégio Gestor. In the treatment of data, a graphical analysis was performed to characterize the
survey respondents and Cronbach's Alpha and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to validate the
scale. As for the findings, it was identified that there are twice as many men as women working in
the formulation of strategies in the IFRN; the average age of respondents is 36 years; approximately
95% of respondents have higher education or some postgraduate degree and also have up to 15
years of service at the IFRN. Finally, the three dimensions of the measurement scale showed
acceptable consistency, adequacy and degree of reliability, so it is concluded that the result provides
evidence for its application in public organizations. However, it should be noted that there are
certain differences between the solution presented here and the original scale. As an example, of the
30 items initially analyzed in the scale, 24 were validated. |
|---|