Entre a máxima lampedusiana e o estado democrático de direito: a atuação da frente parlamentar evangélica no Brasil (2015-2018)
The present work aims to analyze the main bills and proposed amendments elaborated by the Evangelical Parliamentary Front under the constitutional point of view and of a democratic rule of law, as well as some speeches given by this same front. The hypothesis raised is about the issue of insertion o...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Dissertação |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/46835 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | The present work aims to analyze the main bills and proposed amendments elaborated by the
Evangelical Parliamentary Front under the constitutional point of view and of a democratic rule of law,
as well as some speeches given by this same front. The hypothesis raised is about the issue of insertion
of values considered strictly religious in the political environment, through the performance of
parliamentarians belonging to the Parliamentary Front. For that, the work analyzes the context and text
of the congressmen's bills with the intention of considering and analyzing the real objectives that they
intend to defend even under the aegis of a camouflaged speech, considering the mutation of actions
within the congress through the time. Using the methodology of literature review on the work of the
front and documentary research on the proposed bills, a change in the speech of the parliamentarians
who make up this front was observed, in an attempt to bring more seriousness or scientificity, seeking
to give a lay and natural appearance their speeches in order to mask the religious, fundamentalist and
ideological background which surround the normative productions of this group. Nor can we ignore the
possible consequences of the approval of laws such as these, which aim to collaborate with the
perpetuation of a conservative discourse within contemporary society, as they defend an outdated
concept of family which does not correspond to the needs of society, and furthermore , reinforces an
agenda that leads to hatred and intolerance, consequences that are demonstrated by the analysis of
documents and bills. It has been noted that FPE works on two fronts. The first is intended to develop
content that encompasses the theme about "body control". The second front, on the other hand,
emphasizes the strategy of creating norms aimed at maintaining the achievements achieved by religious
groups and creating new privileges. For the first front, PL 6583/2013 (also known as the Family Statute)
was chosen, while for the second, PEC 99/2011, which deals with the legitimacy of religious entities
nationwide to propose direct action of unconstitutionality. Finally, it is considered that the great
challenge imposed on the democratic rule of law will be to guarantee freedom of belief and at the same
time ensure that the performance of these national Christian religious associations does not stifle the
rights of others considered minor and without representation at the same time, in which the legal
achievements of minority groups are preserved. |
|---|