Diálogos entre autor e revisor: arena discursiva na ferramenta comentário
Any text would not be published without the look of otherness of the reviewer. This study, based on Applied Linguistic, analyze the relationship between reviewer and author, before the process of publishing a work. This relationship underlies in the utterances produced in the comments of the tool of...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | doctoralThesis |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/46620 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | Any text would not be published without the look of otherness of the reviewer. This study,
based on Applied Linguistic, analyze the relationship between reviewer and author, before the
process of publishing a work. This relationship underlies in the utterances produced in the
comments of the tool of reviewing, disponible in a software of texts edition. This discursive
gender has a characteristic clearly dialogic, as long as is expecting an answer from the
discussion partner. This responsiveness is, sometimes, polemic, when the author can come
establish a ideological conflict with reviewer, taking a position related to the suggestions of
chance to the text. This study presents a qualitative and interpretivist analyze, since it aims to
understand and interpret some aspects in the interaction between who writes and who reviews
the text. As theoretical references, it has the presupposes of the Circle of Bakhtin, related to
concepts like: dialogism (between author and reviewer), look of otherness/extralocal point of
view (that is present in the reviewer process), not alibi (who signs the text has the responsibility
about it), chronotope (dialogism among subjects in a diverse space-time), open and hidden
polemic (not always harmonious among subjects during interaction). The data collection
consists of comments in didactic materials produced by Secretaria de Educação a Distância
from Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, from 2012 to 2015. Results point that the
work of reviewing is a discursive arena where points of view are continuously in conflict, being
reviewed and, eventually, reworked, having, in this process, multiples learnings and to both
subjects. In this interrelation, each one must be conscious about their place and the limits
inherent to this activity, stablishing negotiations to create a work in group in a cooperative way,
resulting in a didactic material appropriate to the teaching and the learning of the student from
Distance Education. |
|---|