Rememorando as carnes: o corpo feminino como espaço de inscrição das memórias das torturas durante a Ditadura Civil-Militar brasileira
This work has the objective to produce a study about the body and how memories are inscribed on its spatial surface. Therefore, when thinking about the body as a space, we have to specify which body is this to which we direct our research; as it is seen, described and understood within the historica...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Otros Autores: | |
Formato: | Dissertação |
Lenguaje: | pt_BR |
Publicado: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/43721 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Sumario: | This work has the objective to produce a study about the body and how memories are inscribed on
its spatial surface. Therefore, when thinking about the body as a space, we have to specify which
body is this to which we direct our research; as it is seen, described and understood within the
historical and social context in which it is found. Therefore, this dissertation is anchored in the
female body seen and understood as subversive, but it is also dedicated to the study of these same
bodies and their transformations in different temporalities. That is, a fixed and immutable temporal
delimitation does not fit in the work developed here, since the main support of the research is
constituted by the memories of women who experienced the policy of persecution and torture put
into practice during the Brazilian civil-military dictatorship (1964-1985), that because it is a
relatively borderline event with the present, still produces reflections in the lives of women whose
memories we will focus at. In addition, we treated how the violence was produced against the
female bodily space and why certain spots of the bodies were affected and others were not, and,
consequently, how the body submited to these violations responded. Another important aspect that
we will reflect on makes reference to these same bodies and their respective processes of resistance
and reconstruction. To this purpose, the analysis of archeogenealogical discourse and quantitative
history will be essential procedures during the development of the analysis of the countless
statements, testimonies and interviews that were carried out from the end of the 1990s to the present moment. |
---|