A concepção de pluralismo no Serviço Social brasileiro: um estudo a partir do Conselho Federal de Serviço Social (CFESS)
This dissertation had as general objective to analyze the concept of pluralism in the Brazilian Social Work, taking as reference the Federal Council of Social Work (CFESS). In this profession, pluralism presents itself as an essential element of training and professional practice. However, despite i...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Dissertação |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/43684 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | This dissertation had as general objective to analyze the concept of pluralism in the
Brazilian Social Work, taking as reference the Federal Council of Social Work (CFESS). In this
profession, pluralism presents itself as an essential element of training and professional practice.
However, despite its importance, it prevails as an ethical principle little understood and studied. In
this context, we argue that situating how the category's representative bodies - and more
specifically the CFESS - conceive it is a crucial step to understand how it materializes in the
profession, and, consequentially, contribute to fill this gap. In this sense, the specific objectives
that guided the research included understanding the historical social determinants of the
development of pluralism in Brazilian Social Work; examine the theoretical and ideological bases
of the concept of pluralism adopted by the Federal Council of Social Work; and to identify the
contours of this conception. For the development of this study, we carried out, based on an
ontological approach, a qualitative research of an explanatory nature. The theoretical instruments
made it possible to situate pluralism in society - understanding it as an ambiguous phenomenon
that emerged from modernity - as well as its establishment in the Brazilian Social Work during the
period of professional renewal. In addition, we point out the general features that make up the new
hegemony established since then, which was configured as the ground on which a new way of
conceiving and concretizing pluralism in the profession was developed. It was precisely on the
basis of this scenario that we sought, in the following chapters, to expose CFESS's concept of
pluralism. For that, we used a documentary research, which analyzed, with the help of a script,
fifteen sources of CFESS. The results obtained revealed that the entity's conception of pluralism is
based on the defense of a non-neutrality and on the idea of “hegemony with pluralism”. We
emphasize, in this context, the challenges and the necessary care in dealing with these issues, so
that the profession does not fall into a political mistake and an anti-pluralism. In addition, the
institution presented a negative definition of pluralism associated with a criticism of eclecticism,
as well as, and mainly, a positive definition that understands respect as a “respectful struggle” and
democracy under socialist scopes. We conclude by pointing to the complexity and importance of
this theme, indicating the path of belligerent coexistence as one that understands the limits and
potential of pluralism in Brazilian Social Work. |
|---|