Avaliação do bacharelado em Gestão de Políticas Públicas da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte a partir da percepção dos docentes, discentes e egressos, dez anos após a implantação do curso
The present work deals with the evaluation of the effectiveness of the bachelor's degree in Public Policy Management (GPP) of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, based on the perception of teachers, students and graduates, ten years after the implementation of the course. The rese...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | bachelorThesis |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/41575 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | The present work deals with the evaluation of the effectiveness of the bachelor's
degree in Public Policy Management (GPP) of the Federal University of Rio Grande
do Norte, based on the perception of teachers, students and graduates, ten years after
the implementation of the course. The research is justified by the importance of
knowing how the course is evaluated as to the fulfillment of the objectives established
in the new pedagogical project recently implemented to adapt to the National Curricular
Guidelines and it’s insertion in the Public Field. In order to do so, we sought to know
the origin and the history of the graduation in GPP and the evaluation under the
perception of the teachers, students and alumni, their convergences and divergences
on the effectiveness of the implementation of the course. The empirical research was
carried out by the mixed method (qualitative and quantitative) and the result was that
the course was implemented through the Federal University Restructuring and
Expansion Support Program (REUNI); the actors surveyed evaluate how effective the
course proposal is; among respondents there are convergences in most points, but
there are differences between them in some of the objectives evaluated. Finally, in
view of the study carried out and the answers obtained, it is concluded that despite a
positive evaluation, the research identified ponctual inefficiencies that need to be
corrected. |
|---|