Boas práticas em Gestão Editorial: um estudo comparativo de periódicos da área da Ciência da Informação
This work aimed to analyze from a comparative perspective the fulfillment of guiding principles of good publishing practices in three scientific journals in the area of Information Science. As a theoretical framework, a brief history of the emergence of scientific journals and their migration from...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | bachelorThesis |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/39819 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | This work aimed to analyze from a comparative perspective the fulfillment of guiding principles of good publishing practices in three scientific journals in the area of Information Science. As a theoretical framework, a brief history of the emergence of scientific journals
and their migration from the printed to the electronic format made possible by Information and Communication Technologies is presented. It is also analyzed that in view of the exponential growth of titles of created journals and the cognitive market practiced by commercial publishers, there was a need to create quality indicators for scientific journals that adhere to the open access model. In order to carry out the research, documents guiding good editorial management practices proposed by the Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE) and Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) were located; the principles, criteria and policies for the management of journals were identified and based on these indicators, the publishing policies and processes of renowned journals in the area of Information Science were compared, identifying and indicating best publishing practices. The comparative analysis was carried out with the journals: Informação & Sociedade, Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação e Transinformação. The analysis showed that magazines generally comply with the principles of good publishing practices listed by COPE and SciELO. However, there are aspects to be improved, such as the establishment
of explicit policies to address ethical issues and research integrity, and information on whether or not to charge publication fees, the latter being identified only in the journal Transinformation. The identified principles can serve as a reference both for new electronic scientific journals, and for those already in force and who wish to improve their evaluations through the evaluation agencies. |
|---|