Complexo Campus: recomendações para a residência universitária de graduação do Campus Central da UFRN sob o olhar do usuário
On the Brazilian context, student housing constitutes important housing typology since they are properties intended to settle students and, specifically on the studied case, at no charge, since it has as target audience lower income students, who are often times original from distinct cities than wh...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | bachelorThesis |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/36791 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | On the Brazilian context, student housing constitutes important housing typology since they are properties intended to settle students and, specifically on the studied case, at no charge, since it has as target audience lower income students, who are often times original from distinct cities than which the higher educational institutions are located. At Natal (RN), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte’s (UFRN) Undergrad University Residence on Central Campus can’t meet the rising demand for vacancies at the housing – which underline the need for more units. Therefore, the academic interest turns back to creating new residences other than to the evaluation and questioning of how satisfactory and functional are the current existing residential buildings on Campus. Inside Complexo Campus it is noticeable the under sizing of internal rooms as well as their under use. The high density of four people by room and thirty-two by floor along with the noticed design problems foster an environment that directly affects the alumni behavior regarding the Residence and their personal interactions. So, with the intention of experience and validate resident students’ perspectives, and ensure comfortable spaces that better meet their needs, the main goal is to offer spatial adjustments at preliminary draft level, using Environmental Psychology in order to perform a Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE). In order to obtain this result, a multimethod approach was needed, applying questionnaires with the students, carrying out “walkthrough” and behavioral mappings centered on the place (Sommer; Sommer, 2002), checking current regulations, and general observations, apart from an extensive collation of authors from this field of study - in order to establish concepts such as “personalization”, “territoriality”, “privacy” and “appropriation” -, such as Ornstein (1992), Sommer (1973), Rabinowitz (1984), Castro (2009, 2010), Malard (1992) and Elali (1998, 2000, 2013, 2015, 2017), to apply the user’s view as guiding element to make refurbishing design decisions that may occur on three implementation phases – short, medium and long term. |
|---|