O projeto urbano enquanto processo projetual: compreensão, prática e especificidades
This thesis investigates the design process in urban and architectural design; as object, the urban design process, performed by architecture and urbanism graduation course students of Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), during workshops, offered for this purpose. The research question is subdiv...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | doctoralThesis |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/33967 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | This thesis investigates the design process in urban and architectural design; as object, the urban
design process, performed by architecture and urbanism graduation course students of
Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), during workshops, offered for this purpose. The research
question is subdivided in three: has urban design any specificities as design process; how designers
understand and practice the urban design; still, how they seen their own design experience;
considering the adopted context? Assumes as hypothesis the affirmation that urban design process
has specificities; that in adopted cutout, designs are predominantly generated taking previous
experiences, than methodological strategies that aim tools for design process, looking for solution
and final products, instead design problem and process; so, a less reflexive practice, without
knowing clearly the concept, topics and contexts inherent to urban design, and with most
technocratic approach than methodological. The goal is to identify which are the urban design
specificities through confrontation, in one side by theoretical-methodological approach of rational
problem solving and reflection in action, and in other side, design process analysis developed in
workshops with training designers, specifically the architecture and urbanism graduation course of
UFPB. The research is structured by three Investigation Axis, to know: Axis 1 – Positioning of
designers about their own design process; Axis 2 – Understanding and practice of urban design;
Axis 3 – Comparison between practices of urban and architectural design. The method gets backing
in the rational problem solution by Simon (2019), with counterpoint in reflection in action by Schön
(1983), both as argued by Dorst & Dijkhuis (1995); in association with design workshop and focal
group as data collect strategies. The thesis is based in theoretical-analytical discussions about
urban design, design process in general, mapping methods, and design workshop as design practice
facilitator. As outcomes, some specificities of urban design, as design process, are presented from
the comparison of architectural design practice. This (urban design) has more analytical, strategic,
methodological, constructive and immaterial character; meanwhile the second one, has an
analytical, solution aimed, practical and material. In adopted outcut, is possible to identify reflexive
practices of design, knowing of concept and aspects of urban design practice, also as, the designers
approaches their own design process critically. |
|---|