Eles não usam Lattes: precarização e invisibilidade social dos trabalhadores terceirizados na UFRN
The present study investigates the precarization and social invisibility processes of outsourced workers at the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) and how the both feedback each other. In order to seek the understanding of the phenomenon, we started from a critical bibliography on...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | doctoralThesis |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/32761 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | The present study investigates the precarization and social invisibility processes of outsourced
workers at the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) and how the both
feedback each other. In order to seek the understanding of the phenomenon, we started from a
critical bibliography on the subject of work (MARX, 2010) and its “flexibility” (HARVEY,
2008; ANTUNES, 2017; MÉSZÁROS, 2009) in contemporary society, marked by aporophobia
(CORTINA, 2017). Moreover, we discussed some reports from precarious workers themselves,
including interviews contained in books on the subject (COSTA, 2004; DIAS, 2014;
NASCIMENTO, 2016). The external cleaning work at the university is invisible, as already
researched, but we are investigating here how this happens with workers who share the same
internal spaces, observing a case of extreme separation between intellectual and manual work.
Separation operated and observed from everyday life (HELLER, 2014; GOFFMAN, 2014;
SENNETT, 2012; KOSIK, 2010; NETTO, 2007). Finally, we understand that the locus of the
university must be considered as a fundamental element in research within the conceptual pair
university-organization and university-institution (CHAUÍ, 2001), as it produces and
reproduces some theories and ideas (EAGLETON, 1996; HARVEY, 2008; JAMESON, 1997)
that affect the social life of the university, reinforcing that the workers inserted in it are, in all
senses, paradoxically, an external community. |
|---|