Governança metropolitana face à implementação do Estatuto da Metrópole: um estudo da região metropolitana da Grande Vitória/ES
In Brazil, metropolitan governance has been the object of apprehension by government managers given the relevance of Metropolitan Regions (MR) for socioeconomic development. In this context, it is possible to point out important advances in the creation of an institutional design that collaborate...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Dissertação |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/32379 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | In Brazil, metropolitan governance has been the object of apprehension by government
managers given the relevance of Metropolitan Regions (MR) for socioeconomic development.
In this context, it is possible to point out important advances in the creation of an institutional
design that collaborates with responses to the numerous challenges inherent in the theme,
among which, the Metropolitan Statute (EM, initials in Portuguese) beneath the format of the
Federal Law No. 13.089, of January 12, 2015. The purpose of the EM is to establish general
guidelines for metropolitan governance, mainly through the preparation and approval of the
Integrated Urban Development Plan (PDUI, initials in Portuguese). The PDUI is configured as
the maximum instrument for the organization, planning and execution of public functions of
common interest in the municipalities that are part of the MR. For the implementation of the
Plan, the clause of administrative improbity (Administrative Improbity Law — Law No.
8.429/92) was added as a penalty for public managers who failed to prepare and approve the
PDUI by January 2018. However, the changes promoted by the Federal Law No. 13,683, of
June 19, 2018, place the Metropolitan Statute in a threatening position, since the concerned
legislation removed the punishment in the case managers fail to take the necessary measures to
generate the PDUI. It is argued, therefore, that the institutional and political impasses to the
implementation of the Metropolitan Statute will be increased given the current modifications in
Law No. 13,683/2018, which inserted the element of discretion over the main instrument of its
implementation. Thereat, the PDUI now occurs for the convenience and opportunity of public
managers when establishing governance relations, in the search to solve the public management
of common interests in MR. For that manner, the present study aims to investigate the
metropolitan governance in its interface with the guidelines of the Metropolitan Statute,
considering the aspects of institutional organization, management and metropolitan planning,
particularly in the Greater Vitória Metropolitan Region (RMGV, initials in Portuguese),
considering that the managers responsible for the RMGV have advanced in the implementation
of the EM, through the elaboration and approval of the PDUI, in the first term determined by
the Law No. 13.089/2015. For this purpose, the theoretical and methodological basis that
supports this analysis has as reference an adaptation of the “Governance Structures” model
established by João Seixas, Rosa Branco and Sol Garson (2012). The methodology, following
the guidelines of an interdisciplinary research, presents a qualitative approach, using
bibliographic (metropolitan governance) and documentary (legislation on EM and RMGV)
research. The research was complemented with semi-structured interviews conducted with
actors responsible for the management of the RMGV and with participation in the preparation
of the PDUI. At the end, it was found that coercion positively moved the institutional aspects
for the elaboration of the PDUI, bringing the RMGV closer to the consolidation of the EM.
However, the non-implementation of the Plan and the non-creation of the executive body
formed by the representatives of the Executive Powers (state and municipal) distances the
Region from the effective implementation of the guidelines of the Metropolitan Statute. |
|---|