O Youtube como aparelho privado de hegemonia: a experiência da onda conservadora no Brasil contemporâneo
The dynamics of the Extended State operates institutions that continuously manage the class struggle through a consensus established by a Hegemony. Such dynamics can also be changed based on the disputes that occur within the scope of Civil Society and the demands for the reproduction of capital....
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Dissertação |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/32350 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | The dynamics of the Extended State operates institutions that continuously
manage the class struggle through a consensus established by a Hegemony. Such dynamics
can also be changed based on the disputes that occur within the scope of Civil Society and the
demands for the reproduction of capital. When reproduction is hindered, starting an economic
crisis, or the condition of the class struggle changes, it is possible that the consensus wears
out, leading to a Hegemony Crisis, at which time a new consensus is established, but not
without the resolution of disputes operated by the Private Devices of Hegemony. Brazil is
going through a crisis of this kind that broke out in June 2013, overturning a consensus
established since the end of the dictatorship that was based on democracy and human rights.
At this time, virtual tools also became popular, which were quickly politicized and
transformed into forms of organization and dissemination by various sectors of the right,
which occupied them successfully, with special attention to Youtube. Based on this, we seek
to discuss the social role of Youtube in the crisis of hegemony that was established in Brazil
in the collapse of the PT socialist democratic project. For this, we analyzed 55 videos from 11
channels, separated into four groups: “Men of Faith”, “Liberals”, “Journalists” and
“Patriarchs”, seeking to analyze how these channels represent projects of society and how the
amalgamation of such projects in the conservative wave as in Brazil. We saw that such a
union lost strength after Bolsonaro's victory, but that the different sectors are still strong
separately, operating their private devices of hegemony and reorganizing themselves
according to the demands of capital, which dictate all state policies and, in the face of their
structural crisis, demands more and more. |
|---|