Repercussão da prática do Tummy Time sobre os marcos motores de lactentes
Aim: To identify the repercussions of Tummy Time in reaching the milestones of infants between 1 to 6 months and to track the risk of developmental delay between 6 and 12 months. Method: Longitudinal observational study carried out with caregivers of infants, between 1 and 6 months, attended at a...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Dissertação |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/31441 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | Aim: To identify the repercussions of Tummy Time in reaching the milestones of infants
between 1 to 6 months and to track the risk of developmental delay between 6 and 12 months.
Method: Longitudinal observational study carried out with caregivers of infants, between 1 and
6 months, attended at a public maternity and child health care service. From the report obtained
in the structured interview, sociodemographic data, information on pregnancy, childbirth and
the newborn were collected; care for the child, familiarity of the parents with prone position’s
practice and the age at which the child reached the motor milestones, classified as typical (when
he presented the expected milestone for age) or atypical (when he did not). A second contact
was made at 6 and 12 months of age to track the risk of delayed motor development by Survey
of Wellbeing of Young Children (SWYC). To identify the repercussions of Tummy Time’s
practice in reaching motor milestones, infants were allocated to the Tummy Time Group (when
the parents reported setting aside a daily time to perform the Tummy Time) or the Control
Group (other infants) and the Chi-square test was performed for an association analysis.
Results: 72 families were evaluated and 39 included in the analysis, 21 were allocated to the
Tummy Time group. In the comparison between the groups, 71.43% of the infants who reached
the expected motor milestone were in the Tummy Time group, while 66.7% of the Control
Group showed atypical development for their age (p = 0.0174). Conclusions: The acquisition
of motor milestones predominated in the group that practiced the Tummy Time daily,
suggesting, within its limitations, a positive association of the method in motor development,
but not representing a later risk of delay. |
|---|