Construção e validação de cenários de simulação de Suporte Básico de Vida na Atenção Básica
This study aimed to develop and to validate six medium fidelity Basic Life Support clinical simulation scenarios in Primary Health Care. Development and content validation descriptive study. American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Dissertação |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/31256 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | This study aimed to develop and to validate six medium fidelity Basic Life Support clinical
simulation scenarios in Primary Health Care. Development and content validation descriptive
study. American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and
Emergency Cardiovascular Care and Cardiovascular Prevention Guideline of the Brazilian
Society of Cardiology between 2015 and 2019 were used to develop the scenarios. According
to Fabri et al. (2017), author elaborated seven criteria for scenarios: previous student
knowledge, learning objectives, theoretical foundation of activity, scenario preparation,
scenario development, debriefing and evaluation. A list of experts was prepared based on
network professor adviser. Experts received two attachments: a document containing the
scenario, the sociodemographic characterization and the scale of agreement and Free and
Informed Consent Form (ICF). Experts who did not respond the validation through emails we
sought and those who partially responded were excluded. The sample was consisted for seven
experts. Medical or nurses experts with experience in clinical simulation and BLS and
minimum master's degree validated and judged those scenarios according to Content
Validation Index (IVC). Majority of them were between 35 and 45 years old, were nurses, had
doctorate as maximum degree, worked as teacher, had professional experience up to 14 years
and experience in clinical simulation time of 5 to 8 years, had Basic Life Support experience
of 13 years or more. Scenarios obtained CVI between 85.7% and 100%, and experts'
suggestions were incorporated into the scenarios. Construction and validation of clinical
simulation scenarios brings greater reliability to scenarios thems and make facilitators waste
less time for their construction, however there is not adaptation to local peculiarities. In
addition, it allows its reapplication by other professionals, facilitators, teachers or scholars
who work with clinical simulation. |
|---|