De pessoa com deficiência auditiva a surdo: embates dialógicos e objetificação colonial no processo de transição identitária
By an inclusive perspective, the special education and deaf studies have fought battles in the academic field regarding the deaf people along the last years. In what concerns to the social issue, there were many distinct approaches and focuses adopted, which even culminated in different terminolo...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Dissertação |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/31192 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | By an inclusive perspective, the special education and deaf studies have fought battles
in the academic field regarding the deaf people along the last years. In what concerns to
the social issue, there were many distinct approaches and focuses adopted, which even
culminated in different terminologies. One of the most discussed example in scientific
literature is the terms “person with hearing disability” in opposition to “deaf person”.
Above any controversies around the option for one of those terms, there is the fact that
people with hearing disabilities, whether exposed or not to signal languages, started
being understood by different perspectives. As a result, there are very few researches
about them. With that said, this research aims to identify the dialogical clashes and the
forms of colonial objectification in the process of transition of identity of people with
hearing disabilities. To do so, our theoretical perspective is based on the studies about
colonial objectification (BHABHA, 1994; 1998; FANON, 1681; BOAVENTURA
SANTOS E MENEZES, 2009), identity (HALL, 2006; BAUMAN, 2005), the
conception of language of Bakhtin Circle (BAKHTIN, 1997; 2002; 2010; 2011; 2017;
FARACO, 2009; VOLÓCHINOV, 2017; BRAIT, 2005; 2017; SOBRAL, 2019) and,
finally, Deaf Culture, (PERLIN, 1998; 2003; 2016; STROBEL, 2008; 2009;
QUADROS, 2019; LADD, 2013). Our subjects were six (6) deaf students of the
undergraduate course Letras – Libras and Portuguese Language at UFRN. The data
were collected through a half-structured interview, in Libras, using the round of
conversation format. From this analysis, the following categories emerged: transition of
identity, colonial objectification and dialogical clashes. We observed that the people
with hearing disabilities enjoy the possibility of transition of identity when they get in
touch with signal language and with other deaf people. In this process, the forces of
language are accentuated, once they enable the Identity of the deaf to substitute the
reach of the hearing standard. However, those forces remain in the process of boiling,
since forces of containment/monologization and resistance/subversion also exist in deaf
communities. That said, we evoke the importance that deaf ways of being are kept away
from dichotomies oriented towards normality / abnormality, and that we can unlearn to
learn, so that speaking deaf people can (re)exist. |
|---|