Genealogia e teoria de gênero em Judith Butler: subversões teórico-políticas
The gender theory developed by Judith Butler has consolidated itself as a milestone in feminist, gender and sexuality studies. In her theoretical constructions, the philosopher dialogues with the thoughts of several authors, such as Hegel, Austin, Derrida, Nietzsche, Kristeva and Foucault. This d...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | doctoralThesis |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/30418 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | The gender theory developed by Judith Butler has consolidated itself as a milestone in
feminist, gender and sexuality studies. In her theoretical constructions, the philosopher
dialogues with the thoughts of several authors, such as Hegel, Austin, Derrida, Nietzsche,
Kristeva and Foucault. This dissertation focus on the relations of gender theory in Butler
with the theorization about power and resistance in the latter author. Initially, a general
overview of the main repercussions of different authors in the work of the philosopher is
carried out, evidencing the influences that the theory of performativity in Austin and
subsequent Deredian reinterpretations; the discussions around recognition in Hegel;
deontologization in Nietzsche; and the abjection in Kristeva exert on Judith Butler's
theoretical construct about genders, bodies and sexualities. Subsequently, it focuses on the
dialogues that Butler conducts with the discussions around power and resistance in Foucault,
in the sense of realizing a genealogy of the gender as an analytical category of a given
distribution of powers in the social and political field. In this sense, it is possible to infer that
the Foucaultian conception of power permeates the discussions carried out by Butler in the
field of genders, so that the philosopher sees the normative character of the gender category,
as well as finds on it the possibilities of subversion operated from the struggles and
resistances exercised by the subjects who, from their differences in the sex-gender sphere,
allow the questioning and the modification of the symbolic places that support the relations
of domination. Finally, it is made clear how, in order to arrive at these findings, what Butler
operated was a genealogy of the gender from his Foucautian conception plus dialogues with
psychoanalytic thinking, in order to constitute a critical theory with a high potential for
epistemological and politics transformation. |
|---|