O problema da responsabilidade moral em Arthur Schopenhauer
In Schopenhauer’s philosophy, freedom lies in the Will only, actions are necessarily determined by causality. Thus, how would this simultaneous performance be compatible in man, the freedom of metaphysical will and the determinism of individual actions? Schopenhauer assures that every action is d...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Dissertação |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/30271 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| id |
ri-123456789-30271 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| institution |
Repositório Institucional |
| collection |
RI - UFRN |
| language |
pt_BR |
| topic |
Schopenhauer Responsabilidade Liberdade Necessidade Asseidade |
| spellingShingle |
Schopenhauer Responsabilidade Liberdade Necessidade Asseidade Góis, Allanah Sâmela Leonez Ferreira de O problema da responsabilidade moral em Arthur Schopenhauer |
| description |
In Schopenhauer’s philosophy, freedom lies in the Will only, actions are necessarily
determined by causality. Thus, how would this simultaneous performance be
compatible in man, the freedom of metaphysical will and the determinism of individual
actions? Schopenhauer assures that every action is determined in the same proportion as
a clock, but he also declares that man in his essence is will, which is free, almighty and
enigmatic. This apparent contradiction can lead to the following question: how can man
be determined, as in, not able to decide to be otherwise, but yet may be considered as
his own work? This research follows analyzing the concepts involved in the problem
brought up, looking for the answers that we can find in Schopenhauer’s thought. Once
understanding that according actions are the result of motives known by the intellect in
contact with the individual character, we will deal with the attributes of the character,
taking into account that it is the will in itself as it comes objectified in a individual, as
well as the secondary and accidental nature of the intellect, which despite being placed
by tradition as the nucleus of man and the center of moral responsibility, we will see
that it has an auxiliary role as a mere part of an organism. The will takes therefore
precedence over the intellect as the essence and origin of man. For an understanding of
its originary position we will analyze the meaning of the term aseity, considered by our
author as indispensable for thinking about responsibility and imputability. We will also
deal with the main objections and difficulties raised by scholars and commentators of
Schopenhauer’s thought. The main question is to understand to what extent man can be
held morally responsible for his actions, while it is his own work, in the sense of
possessing aseity as an attribute, considering the freedom of the will and the
determinism of the actions. |
| author2 |
Nascimento, Dax Fonseca Moraes Paes |
| author_facet |
Nascimento, Dax Fonseca Moraes Paes Góis, Allanah Sâmela Leonez Ferreira de |
| format |
masterThesis |
| author |
Góis, Allanah Sâmela Leonez Ferreira de |
| author_sort |
Góis, Allanah Sâmela Leonez Ferreira de |
| title |
O problema da responsabilidade moral em Arthur Schopenhauer |
| title_short |
O problema da responsabilidade moral em Arthur Schopenhauer |
| title_full |
O problema da responsabilidade moral em Arthur Schopenhauer |
| title_fullStr |
O problema da responsabilidade moral em Arthur Schopenhauer |
| title_full_unstemmed |
O problema da responsabilidade moral em Arthur Schopenhauer |
| title_sort |
o problema da responsabilidade moral em arthur schopenhauer |
| publisher |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| url |
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/30271 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT goisallanahsamelaleonezferreirade oproblemadaresponsabilidademoralemarthurschopenhauer |
| _version_ |
1773962487474946048 |
| spelling |
ri-123456789-302712020-10-11T07:39:14Z O problema da responsabilidade moral em Arthur Schopenhauer Góis, Allanah Sâmela Leonez Ferreira de Nascimento, Dax Fonseca Moraes Paes Nahra, Cinara Maria Leite Debona, Vilmar Schopenhauer Responsabilidade Liberdade Necessidade Asseidade In Schopenhauer’s philosophy, freedom lies in the Will only, actions are necessarily determined by causality. Thus, how would this simultaneous performance be compatible in man, the freedom of metaphysical will and the determinism of individual actions? Schopenhauer assures that every action is determined in the same proportion as a clock, but he also declares that man in his essence is will, which is free, almighty and enigmatic. This apparent contradiction can lead to the following question: how can man be determined, as in, not able to decide to be otherwise, but yet may be considered as his own work? This research follows analyzing the concepts involved in the problem brought up, looking for the answers that we can find in Schopenhauer’s thought. Once understanding that according actions are the result of motives known by the intellect in contact with the individual character, we will deal with the attributes of the character, taking into account that it is the will in itself as it comes objectified in a individual, as well as the secondary and accidental nature of the intellect, which despite being placed by tradition as the nucleus of man and the center of moral responsibility, we will see that it has an auxiliary role as a mere part of an organism. The will takes therefore precedence over the intellect as the essence and origin of man. For an understanding of its originary position we will analyze the meaning of the term aseity, considered by our author as indispensable for thinking about responsibility and imputability. We will also deal with the main objections and difficulties raised by scholars and commentators of Schopenhauer’s thought. The main question is to understand to what extent man can be held morally responsible for his actions, while it is his own work, in the sense of possessing aseity as an attribute, considering the freedom of the will and the determinism of the actions. Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES Na filosofia de Schopenhauer, a liberdade reside apenas na Vontade, as ações são determinadas necessariamente pela causalidade. Diante disto, como seria compatível a atuação, simultânea no homem, da vontade metafísica livre e do determinismo das ações individuais? Schopenhauer assegura que todas as ações são determinadas na mesma proporção de um relógio, mas também assegura que o homem em sua essência é vontade, e esta por sua vez é livre, todo-poderosa e insondável. A aparente contradição pode levar ao questionamento: como o homem pode ser determinado, ou seja, não pode decidir ser outro, mas ainda assim pode ser considerado como sua própria obra? Seguiremos analisando os conceitos envolvidos na problemática levantada, buscando as respostas que podemos encontrar para elas na filosofia schopenhaueriana. Sabendo que as ações são resultados dos motivos conhecidos pelo intelecto em contato com o caráter individual, trataremos dos atributos do caráter, levando em consideração que ele se constitui da própria vontade objetivada no indivíduo, assim como trataremos da natureza secundária e acidental do intelecto, que, apesar de ser colocado pela tradição como núcleo do homem e centro de responsabilização moral, veremos que possui um papel auxiliar como parte de um organismo. A vontade, portanto, assume a primazia sobre o intelecto como essência e origem do homem. Para compreender sua posição de originariedade, vamos analisar o significado do termo asseidade, considerado pelo nosso autor como imprescindível para se pensar responsabilidade e imputabilidade. Abordaremos oportunamente as principais objeções e dificuldades encontradas pelos estudiosos e comentadores. A questão principal desta pesquisa consiste em compreender em que medida o homem pode ser responsabilizado moralmente por suas ações, enquanto é a sua própria obra, no sentido de possuir asseidade, considerando-se a liberdade da vontade e o determinismo das ações. 2020-10-05T23:11:56Z 2020-10-05T23:11:56Z 2020-05-29 masterThesis GÓIS, Allanah Sâmela Leonez Ferreira de. O problema da responsabilidade moral em Arthur Schopenhauer. 2020. 71f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Centro de Ciências Humanas, Letras e Artes, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2020. https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/30271 pt_BR Acesso Aberto application/pdf Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Brasil UFRN PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM FILOSOFIA |