Duas ideias em campo: construção de objetos de discurso em debates do programa Fla-Flu
Since 2014, Brazil has been noticing the continuing rise of its historical political-ideological conflicts. The result of this process is the polarization of Brazilian society concerning relevant events of national political scenario. This work starts from this context to investigate the discursi...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Dissertação |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/29925 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | Since 2014, Brazil has been noticing the continuing rise of its historical political-ideological
conflicts. The result of this process is the polarization of Brazilian society concerning relevant
events of national political scenario. This work starts from this context to investigate the
discursive dimension of the polarization amid a verbal confrontation. Our main objective is to
analyze the interactive construction of objects-of-speech in Fla-Flu, an online TV show which
promoted debates along 2016. Our purpose is to observe the impacts of the polarized speech
in the referencing processes during interaction in two of the Fla-Flu debates. To achieve this,
we firstly map the referential progress of these debates following the concept of referencing
strategies (MARCUSCHI; KOCH, 2002; 2006). Then, we reconstitute the referential chains
formed along the construction of objects-of-speech related to the context of political and
social polarization. Finally, we analyze these referential chains in the light of the notions of
polarization (AMOSSY, 2017) and of dispute as a kind of polemic speech (DASCAL, 1994).
Our results reveal that the participants of Fla-Flu debates engage not to achieve
understandings or solutions, but to perpetuate the polarized speech and reinforce the opposing
positions. This suggests that the polarized interaction impact the referencing processes, as it
implies in a deepening of the preexistent instability between discursive categories and the
reality itself. |
|---|