Riso e lágrimas que não têm planos: o sujeito lacerado e a experiência interior, segundo Georges Bataille
This thesis aims to explore the problem of inner experience involved in Georges Bataille’s approach. This work focuses on the Atheological summa and discusses the inner experience as experience that denies the external authority, i.e. as sovereign experience. For Bataille, the authority of the in...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | doctoralThesis |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/29688 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | This thesis aims to explore the problem of inner experience involved in Georges Bataille’s
approach. This work focuses on the Atheological summa and discusses the inner experience as
experience that denies the external authority, i.e. as sovereign experience. For Bataille, the
authority of the inner experience is the own experience, but the authority expiates itself. The
experience is a constant movement of dogma’s contestation and the subject that lives by this
contestation is a subject of the anguish and ecstasy’s limits. As Foucault claims in his Preface
to the transgression, the Bataille’s inner experience is a limit-experience, the excess
commands the experience that is the experience of a subject loss. Thus, Bataille’s thought is a
critique of Hegel’s negativity, because the negation of inner experience is useless negativity.
Bataille wanted to think a philosophy opposite to Hegel’s, a philosophy that puts itself into
the discursive question. The writing about the inner experience reflects the hard quest to
discuss the experience that escapes from the discursive forms. Answering the experience
discourse difficulties, Bataille does some operation in the essence of language, like figurations
and evocations of some images in order to expose a lacerated subject through altered
discursive forms. Furthermore, we claim in this thesis to discuss the eroticism as a
manifestation of the inner experience and body inscription into the field of the desire violence,
covering the concepts of transgression and prohibitions, or transgression and limits. |
|---|