Alfabetização de jovens e adultos: representações sociais de professores da EJA
This research aims to investigate the social representations about literacy of YAE (Youth and Adult Education) teachers and their repercussions on literacy practices. It was carried out with teachers who work with the first segment of Youth and Adult Education, in two educational institutions in...
Сохранить в:
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Другие авторы: | |
| Формат: | Dissertação |
| Язык: | pt_BR |
| Опубликовано: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Предметы: | |
| Online-ссылка: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/29450 |
| Метки: |
Добавить метку
Нет меток, Требуется 1-ая метка записи!
|
| Итог: | This research aims to investigate the social representations about literacy of YAE (Youth and
Adult Education) teachers and their repercussions on literacy practices. It was carried out with
teachers who work with the first segment of Youth and Adult Education, in two educational
institutions in the city of Natal / RN. The theoretical bases used are centered on studies on
literacy; Youth and Adult Education and Theory of Social Representations (Moscovici, 1961).
The theoretical-methodological path of the study is based on the Theory of Social
Representations because it offers understanding of the processes of elaborating representations
about adult literacy and the reverberation of these representations in pedagogical behaviors.
Therefore, the research is characterized as a qualitative exploratory study. The construction of
the data took place through the application of the research instruments: semi-structured
interviews; non-participatory observations and a questionnaire applied to teachers. The analysis
and discussion of the data are based on the assumed theoretical approach, based on the
assumptions of the content analysis of Bardin (2011) and on the interpretive axis of Arruda
(2005). The results, outcomes of the analysis of the triangulation of the data, issued by the
participants show that there is no shared common social representation. There are variations
and contrasts between and within groups. In the first group, there is greater familiarity with the
object of representation and a greater approximation with the practices of literacy for young
people and adults. In the second group there is a hybrid representation, based both on aspects
of the reified universe and common sense and, consequently, greater distance from adult
literacy practices. The representations apprehended are anchored in different elements, the main
one being the initial training and the length of experience in Youth and Adult Education.
Objectification also translates in different ways in the behavior of each study participant. The
relevance of this research is centered on the social relevance of the topic, since it will bring
contributions to the training institutions to rethink their curricula with regard to the training of
teachers who will work with YAE, given that the research pointed out as the main constituent
element of representation literacy training initial training in undergraduate courses. |
|---|