O enfoque das capacidades e as Teorias do Contrato Social: o estado da arte para compreensão de uma racionalidade animal
The aim of this paper is to analyze the classical theory of social contract in the light of Martha Nussbaum's theory of capabilities and John Rawls' theory to present the state of art about the parameters needed to consider non-human animals as subjects capable of a reason, for a compre...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Dissertação |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Brasil
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/28418 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | The aim of this paper is to analyze the classical theory of social contract in the light of
Martha Nussbaum's theory of capabilities and John Rawls' theory to present the state of art
about the parameters needed to consider non-human animals as subjects capable of a reason,
for a comprehensive political theory. We will approach Nussbaum's thesis on the three unsolved
problems of the classical theory of social contract, focusing only on the problem of belonging
to the species, since, in the manner in which the classical theory of contract presents itself, it
does not offer viability to solve the social demands about nationality, disability and belonging
to the species. Therefore, it is necessary to rethink the political theory in its origin, to provide
answers to these questions. This is why, first and foremost, a political theory that also includes
animals, must be considered before any systematic drafting of legislation. The creation of laws
will not offer a solution to animal exploitation if the dogmatic theory that underpins the
Constitution does not correspond to this longing either. Understanding that this work essentially
lends itself to a philosophical exercise, without pretending to find answers, but showing
possible ways, we will analyze the importance of a broader political study, and how it implies
necessary changes to the law, with a view to its application more democratic and less speciesist
legal. |
|---|