"Destronando a Política": democracia no pensamento de Friedrich August von Hayek

Regarded as a great democrat and one of the greatest advocates for liberty in the 20th century, F. A. Hayek has been on the spotlight for (neo)liberal political theory research after 2008's financial crisis. This dissertation seeks to discuss the concept of democracy under Hayek’s thought, m...

Full beskrivning

Sparad:
Bibliografiska uppgifter
Huvudupphovsman: Pessoa, Leonardo Antunes de França
Övriga upphovsmän: Vitullo, Gabriel Eduardo
Materialtyp: Dissertação
Språk:pt_BR
Publicerad: Brasil
Ämnen:
Länkar:https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/27999
Taggar: Lägg till en tagg
Inga taggar, Lägg till första taggen!
Beskrivning
Sammanfattning:Regarded as a great democrat and one of the greatest advocates for liberty in the 20th century, F. A. Hayek has been on the spotlight for (neo)liberal political theory research after 2008's financial crisis. This dissertation seeks to discuss the concept of democracy under Hayek’s thought, making use of Hayek's main philosophy and political theory books, and also his lectures and interviews about the matter. This bibliographical snippet was taken as means to discuss something rather new on brazilian political literature and even in English: Hayek's open support to liberal dictatorships in the 20th century, the ones he used to refer as "transitional dictatorships", supposedly related to a upswing for the concept unlimited democracy that existed before to an ideal and limited model of democracy. The first half of this dissertation introduces the reader to the main concepts stated by Hayek as to show that his option for "limited democracy" is justified by his own social science. The second half makes critical observations about the concept of cultural evolution, market and democracy under Hayek's thoughts, making use of an interdisciplinary literature to argue that Hayek should not be considered a guardian of democracy, if we understood it as participatory democracy, and much less a guardian of liberty, if we understood it as too political liberty.