Governança pública de contratos acadêmicos na UFRN: diagnóstico e proposta de melhorias com foco em mecanismos de controle interno
The research has as its theme the applied public governance in the context of the macroprocess of management of academic contracts at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN). Considering the conclusions of previous studies at UFRN, from Medeiros (2014), Silva (2015), Lima (2017) and...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Dissertação |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Brasil
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/27039 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | The research has as its theme the applied public governance in the context of the
macroprocess of management of academic contracts at the Federal University of Rio
Grande do Norte (UFRN). Considering the conclusions of previous studies at UFRN,
from Medeiros (2014), Silva (2015), Lima (2017) and Nascimento (2017), it was
assumed that the practices of public governance and contract management at UFRN
are incipient, and the institution may be exposed to weaknesses and management
risks not treated properly. The focus on the problematization resulted in a research cut
whose overall objective is to propose improvements to improve internal control
mechanisms in the public governance of academic contracts signed between UFRN
and its Support Foundation (FUNPEC). For this, the mapping of the macroprocess and
the identification of the existing control mechanisms were carried out. With these
elements, subsidies were found to propose the necessary improvements and
improvements. The method that inspired the present study was the research-action
approach, in the technical-political modality and the research classifies itself as applied
nature; approach to the problem, as qualitative; as to the objectives, as descriptive; and
as for the technical procedures, it is presented as a case study. The use of the Bizagi
software for mapping the macroprocess and a semi-structured interview script applied
with the tactical managers of the macroprocess are the composite of research
materials and instruments. As a result, 4 (four) subprocesses were mapped and 62
(sixty two) control mechanisms were identified, 13 (thirteen) in the planning
subprocess, 15 (fifteen) in the execution subprocess, 11 (eleven) in the subprocess of
contract and 23 (twenty-three) in the subprocess of accountability. In addition, these
control mechanisms were classified into three categories: bureaucratic, managerial and
risk-based. Prevalence of bureaucratic controls was detected (68%), with presence of
management controls (58%) and risk-based controls (48%). According to the TCU
(2014) conceptual framework, the governance of academic contracts at the UFRN is at
the intermediate stage, denying the research presupposition, which predicted that
governance will be classified in the initial stage. After the diagnosis, a three-part
improvement plan was prepared: a) improvements in management information
systems, b) a schedule for risk mapping in the macro-process, and c)
recommendations on each of the 62 controls detected in the diagnosis. This
improvement plan is designed to reduce bureaucratic controls by prioritizing
managerial controls and risk-based controls to advance the governance stage from the
intermediate to the improved level, bringing the management of principles and good
governance closer together. practices, with a set of controls focused on the purpose of
the process, based on risk management, performance monitoring and incorporate of
value. |
|---|