Grupos reflexivos com homens autores de violência doméstica contra a mulher: limites e potencialidades
This thesis addresses the care for male perpetrators of domestic violence prescribed by the Law 11.340/2006. The Maria da Penha Law, as it is more commonly known, was established to prevent domestic violence against women and hold offenders accountable. Thus, the general objective of this study w...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | doctoralThesis |
| Idioma: | por |
| Publicado em: |
Brasil
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/26621 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | This thesis addresses the care for male perpetrators of domestic violence prescribed by the Law
11.340/2006. The Maria da Penha Law, as it is more commonly known, was established to
prevent domestic violence against women and hold offenders accountable. Thus, the general
objective of this study was to analyze the constraints and possibilities of a reflective group of
male perpetrators of domestic violence against women in the city of Natal. The research locus
was a support center for women who suffer domestic violence. Data were collected from
September to December 2017, in two stages. The first stage was documental and consisted of
analyzing the records of the patients participating in the 26 reflective groups. The second one
comprised participant observation and semi-structured individual interviews. The results of the
first stage indicated a possible profile of the male perpetrators of domestic violence who
participated in the reflective groups. They are mostly adults from 31 to 40 years, are brown
(“pardo”), and have low level of education and low income. Most cases of violence – especially
physical violence - happened during a romantic relationship. The results of the second stage
suggested the need for improvements to use the potentials of the groups better, mainly in terms
of offenders’ reflection and accountability. Also, the groups alone cannot change the violent
masculinities and the capitalist, patriarchal and racist structure. Wider work is necessary in the
fight for equality and to overcome the current structure, to seek a truly emancipatory praxis. |
|---|