Meritocracia e seleção para cargos comissionados: um estudo no Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia da Paraíba
This dissertation discusses meritocracy and selection of people in the public service, and shows a study that aimed to analyze the extent to which the selection of civil servants for the occupation of the commissioned positions of free nomination within the scope of the Federal Institute of Parai...
Na minha lista:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Outros Autores: | |
Formato: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Publicado em: |
Brasil
|
Assuntos: | |
Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/25192 |
Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
Resumo: | This dissertation discusses meritocracy and selection of people in the public service, and
shows a study that aimed to analyze the extent to which the selection of civil servants for the
occupation of the commissioned positions of free nomination within the scope of the Federal
Institute of Paraiba – IFPB - has been a meritocratic process. The theoretical basis was based
on articles, institutional documents and bibliographical research on meritocracy and public
selection, themes that, historically, have generated many discussions in the public
administration, and are central and indicators in this work. Meritocracy is understood as a set
of values that defines the assignment of criteria for recognition through individual
performance, denying any kind of hereditary, corporate or political privilege. The selection is
the way that management selects professionals to integrate their functional structure, through
a merit system. A descriptive research was carried out with the servers of the Federal Institute
of Paraiba divided into occupants of commissioned and non-occupant positions. For data
collection, interviews were carried out with managers and application of online questionnaires
with servers occupying commissioned positions of free nomination, as well as with those who
do not occupy commissioned positions. The interviews were analyzed through the analysis of
content and the data generated by the questionnaires with the help of SPSS (Statistical
Package for Social Science) software. The main results show that greater transparency is
needed in procedures for indication to minimize the use of political influence for the
occupation of the commissioned positions of free nomination, as well as to create mechanisms
based on clear and objective criteria, without disregarding the power of discretion inherent to
the managers in the selection process. It is concluded that the selection processes for
commissioned positions of free nomination, still cannot be considered a meritocratic process
in the scope of the Federal Institute of Paraiba, thus requiring special care by managers. |
---|