O gênero sentença judicial: um estudo exploratório do plano de texto
This dissertation aims to study genericity in judicial decisions phenomenon, text/discourse genre confined to juridical field from its compositional structure and its text plan. The notion of gender in ATD addressing is located at transition between speech and text and we use as one of the levels...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Dissertação |
| Idioma: | por |
| Publicado em: |
Brasil
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/21558 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | This dissertation aims to study genericity in judicial decisions phenomenon, text/discourse
genre confined to juridical field from its compositional structure and its text plan. The notion
of gender in ATD addressing is located at transition between speech and text and we use as
one of the levels/dimensions of analysis that permeates text plan notion, based on their
compositional structure. Our theoretical anchorage is located in Linguistics Textual general
framework, and, more specifically, in addressing Textual Analysis of Discourses (ATD)
approach developed by Adam (2011a), the notions of genre/discourse of Marcuschi (2002,
2008), Bazerman (2005) and the proposals to establish genericidde of Adam and Heidmann
(2006), Rodrigues, Passeggi e Silva Neto (2010, 2012, 2014), among others. Textual Analysis
of Discourses (ATD) is part of the general theoretical framework of text linguistics and aims
to study sense co(n)text production, based on analysis of concrete texts through the drafting of
certain plans or levels of linguistic analysis. It is a nature documentary research under an
inductive-deductive perspective, qualitative and descriptive. We investigated a corpus of four
court rulings criminal, collected from the site of Rio Grande do Norte Court of Justice -
Judiciary, in First Degree Judged. We noted in our analysis that court ruling has several
generic capabilities that cross in their textual and transtextual levels, establishing a dialogue
intergeneric (ADAM; HEIDMANN, 2011b), being a standardized practice and cognitively
socially instituted and may contain variations, but with crystallized elements and a functional
traditionalism that has not been eliminated through time. Facing social relevance of forensic
text and, especially, court judgment on people's life, we hope to contribute to research that
addresses the study of legal text, especially in genericity elements of judicial sentence. |
|---|