Programas de verdade, "mundos de crença": o verdadeiro segundo Paul Vayne
This study comes to reflect on the place of truth in everyday human experience. The notion of truth, expressed in different ways, in different systems of thought, cultural and historical, reveals the non-uniformity of their meaning and the arbitrary grouping under one name, truth. Given this fact...
Na minha lista:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Outros Autores: | |
Formato: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
Assuntos: | |
Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/20795 |
Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
Resumo: | This study comes to reflect on the place of truth in everyday human experience.
The notion of truth, expressed in different ways, in different systems of thought, cultural
and historical, reveals the non-uniformity of their meaning and the arbitrary grouping
under one name, truth. Given this fact, of so many beliefs taken as absolute, we ask with
the historian Jean Marie Paul Veyne, if the truth is only one, or many called by a word
namesake. If, through their ideas, men cannot access a definitely solid knowledge,
unchanging and jaunty interference of the human condition (as their interests and
affections), then in what sense it can claim a greater and exclusivist truth? Assuming the
impossibility of apprehension of the reality of this type, Paul Veyne develops the notion
of truth programs, referential beliefs assumed as cartographies that direct action and
thought. He defends thus the idea of heterogeneity and plurality, as irreducible elements
of human truths. On the one hand there is in society a plurality of truth programs, on the
other there is a plurality of beliefs that is inside man. That is, in the way they believe the
men also shows plural, because they believe in more than one program and counter
programs. The thought of Paul Veyne is nonetheless a form of skepticism directed at all
supposedly absolute and universal anthropological truths, because depending on the
belief system studied and the specific moment in its history, a set of rules is established
to distinguish the true from the false. |
---|