A formação graduada em psicologia no Brasil: reflexão sobre os principais dilemas em um contexto pos-DCN
Criticism done to the undergraduate training process of the psychologist in Brazil raised debates known as "dilemmas of training". In recent years the classic training model, based on the Minimum Curriculum has undergone a series of changes after the National Curriculum Guidelines (DCN), m...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | doctoralThesis |
| Idioma: | por |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Endereço do item: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/17401 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | Criticism done to the undergraduate training process of the psychologist in Brazil raised
debates known as "dilemmas of training". In recent years the classic training model,
based on the Minimum Curriculum has undergone a series of changes after the National
Curriculum Guidelines (DCN), modifying the context of courses. Thus, this paper
aimed to investigate, in a post- DCN context how undergraduate courses in Psychology
in Brazil have been dealing with the dilemmas of training. So, we decided to analyze the
Course Pedagogical Projects (CPPs) of Psychology in the country. Forty CPPs, selected
by region, academic organization and legal status were collected. The data was grouped
into three blocks of discussions: theoretical, philosophical and pedagogical foundations;
curriculum emphases and disciplines; and professional practices. The results were
grouped into four sets of dilemmas: a) ethical and political; b) theoreticalepistemological;
c) professional practice of the psychologist and d) academic-scientific.
Courses claim a socially committed, generalist, pluralistic training, focusing on
research, non-dissociation of teaching-research-extension, interdisciplinary training and
defending a vision of man and of critical and reflective and non-individualistic
psychology. The curriculum keeps the almost exclusive teaching of the classical areas
of traditional fields of applied Psychology. Training is content based. The clinic is
hegemonic, both in theory and in application fields. The historical debate is scarce and
themes linked to the Brazilian reality are missing, despite having social policies present
in the curricula. Currently, DCNs have a much greater impact on courses due to the
influence of the control agencies, fruit of current educational policy, and the result is felt
in the homogenization of curriculum discourses |
|---|