Acesso à justiça enquanto direito fundamental: efetivação pela defensoria pública
The Federal Constitution of 1988 is recognized for its enlargement in the face of large amount of provisions that make it up, among which many are fundamental rights. The fundamental rules set up the foundation of a democratic state, however, are the necessary legal mechanisms to be effective, it...
Sábháilte in:
| Príomhchruthaitheoir: | |
|---|---|
| Rannpháirtithe: | |
| Formáid: | Dissertação |
| Teanga: | por |
| Foilsithe / Cruthaithe: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
|
| Ábhair: | |
| Rochtain ar líne: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/13925 |
| Clibeanna: |
Cuir clib leis
Níl clibeanna ann, Bí ar an gcéad duine le clib a chur leis an taifead seo!
|
| Achoimre: | The Federal Constitution of 1988 is recognized for its enlargement in the face of large amount
of provisions that make it up, among which many are fundamental rights. The fundamental
rules set up the foundation of a democratic state, however, are the necessary legal
mechanisms to be effective, its exercise is not enough merely to state them, but to offer ways
for them to stop being just written standard on paper, and come to be viewed and exercised
day-to-day. In this sense, access to justice presents itself in our times, as a cornerstone for a
just society dictates. In this light, access to justice can be seen as the most fundamental of
rights, which translates as instruments able to safeguard the fundamental rights not only
against the action/omission violating the state but also the very particular. Furthermore, access
to justice within the legal country, is not right for everyone, despite the willingness of the
Citizen Charter in its article 5, paragraph LXXIV, ensuring that the State shall provide full
and free legal assistance to those in need. More than half of the population lives in poverty
and can´t afford to pay legal fees or court costs as well as a bump in their own ignorance of
their rights. The judiciary, in their primary function, is in charge of trying to correct the
violation of the rights, intending to effect a true distributive justice, serving as a paradigm for
the promotion of substantive equality of human beings, however, is difficult and tortuous
access Justice for those without financial resources. In this vein, we present the Public
Defender, as keeper of the masses in its institutional role, defending a disadvantage, in the
words, as a mechanism for effective access to justice, ensuring therefore fundamental rights.
Public Defenders arise at the time or much discussion highlights the priority of actual access
to justice, custody, therefore, intimate bond with the pursuit of fundamental rights, in which,
that advance the broad range of rights, without whom could defend them or guardianship
them |
|---|