PARACONSISTENT CONTRADICTION IN CONTEXT

Paraconsistent logics are said to domesticate contradictions: in such logics, expressions such as ? and ¬? do not trivialize the theory. In this sense, we are able to violate the Law of Non-Contradiction. The main problem with this kind of characterization concerns the fact that whenever expressions...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Arenhart, Jonas Rafael Becker
Formato: Online
Idioma:por
Publicado em: Portal de Periódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN
Endereço do item:https://periodicos.ufrn.br/saberes/article/view/9730
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
id oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article-9730
record_format ojs
spelling oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article-97302016-07-01T13:05:38Z PARACONSISTENT CONTRADICTION IN CONTEXT Arenhart, Jonas Rafael Becker Paraconsistent logics are said to domesticate contradictions: in such logics, expressions such as ? and ¬? do not trivialize the theory. In this sense, we are able to violate the Law of Non-Contradiction. The main problem with this kind of characterization concerns the fact that whenever expressions such as ? and ¬? are both true, they are no longer a contradiction, but at best a subcontrariety. So, perhaps the biggest challenge consists in explaining what is meant by a ‘paraconsistent contradiction’, that is, by a pair of expressions such as ? and ¬? when ‘¬’ is a paraconsistent negation. We suggest that there is a sensible sense in which such expressions may be understood, involving the introduction of distinct contexts from which ? and ¬? are uttered. In this sense, we can read those expressions as formalizing subcontrariety and provide for an intuitive meaning for ‘paraconsistent contradictions’. Portal de Periódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN 2016-06-30 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://periodicos.ufrn.br/saberes/article/view/9730 Saberes: Revista interdisciplinar de Filosofia e Educação; n. esp. (2016): Saberes: Filosofia e Educação - Filosofia, Lógica e Metafísica analítica - ???o???? II 1984-3879 por https://periodicos.ufrn.br/saberes/article/view/9730/6950 Copyright (c) 2016 Saberes: Revista interdisciplinar de Filosofia e Educação
institution Periódicos UFRN
collection Portal de Pediódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN
language por
format Online
author Arenhart, Jonas Rafael Becker
spellingShingle Arenhart, Jonas Rafael Becker
PARACONSISTENT CONTRADICTION IN CONTEXT
author_facet Arenhart, Jonas Rafael Becker
author_sort Arenhart, Jonas Rafael Becker
title PARACONSISTENT CONTRADICTION IN CONTEXT
title_short PARACONSISTENT CONTRADICTION IN CONTEXT
title_full PARACONSISTENT CONTRADICTION IN CONTEXT
title_fullStr PARACONSISTENT CONTRADICTION IN CONTEXT
title_full_unstemmed PARACONSISTENT CONTRADICTION IN CONTEXT
title_sort paraconsistent contradiction in context
description Paraconsistent logics are said to domesticate contradictions: in such logics, expressions such as ? and ¬? do not trivialize the theory. In this sense, we are able to violate the Law of Non-Contradiction. The main problem with this kind of characterization concerns the fact that whenever expressions such as ? and ¬? are both true, they are no longer a contradiction, but at best a subcontrariety. So, perhaps the biggest challenge consists in explaining what is meant by a ‘paraconsistent contradiction’, that is, by a pair of expressions such as ? and ¬? when ‘¬’ is a paraconsistent negation. We suggest that there is a sensible sense in which such expressions may be understood, involving the introduction of distinct contexts from which ? and ¬? are uttered. In this sense, we can read those expressions as formalizing subcontrariety and provide for an intuitive meaning for ‘paraconsistent contradictions’.
publisher Portal de Periódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN
publishDate 2016
url https://periodicos.ufrn.br/saberes/article/view/9730
work_keys_str_mv AT arenhartjonasrafaelbecker paraconsistentcontradictionincontext
_version_ 1766681696120340480