THE ARGUMENTATIVE POWER OF FAKE NEWS ON DIGITAL NETWORKS
In this work, we examined twenty-eight fallacious texts made available on the website Aosfatos.org and related to the results of the 2022 Brazilian presidential elections. Our purpose was: i) identify recurring interactional, textual and cognitive strategies in sets of Fake News and examin...
Na minha lista:
| Principais autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online |
| Idioma: | por |
| Publicado em: |
Portal de Periódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN
|
| Endereço do item: | https://periodicos.ufrn.br/RevSaridh/article/view/34598 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | In this work, we examined twenty-eight fallacious texts made available on the website Aosfatos.org and related to the results of the 2022 Brazilian presidential elections. Our purpose was: i) identify recurring interactional, textual and cognitive strategies in sets of Fake News and examine the argumentative role of these textual productions; iii) Describe describe how texts are operationalized in digital social movements. Theoretically, we are based on Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca (1996 [1958]) and on the text-discourse studies by van Dijk and Kintsch (1983), Koch (1996), Marcuschi (2007), Morato, Bentes (2013). The results point to the repetition as central strategy, which was fortified by logical of algorithms and the political polarization scenario. Moreover, from an argumentative point of view, Fake News needs to be examined in groupings of text-discourses because this group and the dynamics of the networks can indicate how the argumentative force of these productions occurs.
|
|---|